<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boing Boing &#187; cold war</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/tag/cold-war/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The places Soviet tourists could not visit in the&#160;1950s</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/16/the-places-soviet-tourists-cou.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/16/the-places-soviet-tourists-cou.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the bomb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=230663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, there were some private citizens from the USSR who were allowed into the U.S. for travel during the Cold War. But they couldn't just visit anywhere they wanted. This map, from a post at Slate's Vault blog, shows the no-go zones, shaded in green. Some of this is quite funny &#8212; gee, guys, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ProhibitedMapFinal.jpg.CROP_.article920-large.jpg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ProhibitedMapFinal.jpg.CROP_.article920-large-600x422.jpg" alt="" title="ProhibitedMapFinal.jpg.CROP.article920-large" width="600" height="422" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-230664" /></a></p>


<p>Apparently, there were some private citizens from the USSR who were allowed into the U.S. for travel during the Cold War. But they couldn't just visit anywhere they wanted.</p>

<p>This map,<a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2013/05/15/cold_war_map_shows_areas_prohibited_to_soviet_travelers_in_the_united_states.html"> from a post at Slate's Vault blog</a>, shows the no-go zones, shaded in green. Some of this is quite funny &mdash; gee, guys, I wonder what you're keeping hidden out in rural Nevada? Another interesting point: Soviets could visit Kansas City, Kansas, but not Kansas City, Missouri. Which could just be a pretty good joke, on our part. The fun stuff is all on the Missouri side.</p> 

<p><strong>EDIT: </strong>In the original version of this post, I'd mentioned that Kansas had once been home to many, many missile silos, and speculated that this might be why so much of that state (and the Dakotas) was off-limits to Soviet travelers. But, Cold War historian Audra J. Wolfe contacted me and pointed out that there were no missile silos at the time this map was made, because there were no Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. So why ban the Ruskies from Kansas? Wolfe isn't entirely sure. She speculated that it might have had something to do with limiting access to public lands managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs or the Bureau of Land Management. It also could have been tied to the presence of Strategic Air Command bases in the state. And there were tons of Atomic Energy Commission-owned sites scattered all over the U.S. &mdash; it's hard to keep track of where they all were.</p>

<p>Of course, Wolfe also said that there wasn't always a clear logic behind the decisions about which parts of the country were made off-limits to Soviet citizens. For instance, much of our coastline was off-limits for no other reason than the fact that much of the Soviet coast was off-limits to Americans. "The main premise is 'strict reciprocity'," she wrote in a message to me. "X% of Soviet coasts are off-limits, therefore x% of US coasts are off-limits, too." So there, one might add.</p> 

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/05/16/the-places-soviet-tourists-cou.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstract Expressionism was a CIA&#160;plot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/24/abstract-expressionism-was-a-c.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/24/abstract-expressionism-was-a-c.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usausausa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=226290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this 1995 Independent article, you can read about the former CIA officer who admitted that the Agency secretly funded and promoted Abstract Expressionism as a way for avant-garde, lefty types to reconcile their worldview with American values, rather than Soviet-style Communism. They operated in secret to avoid "the public hostility to the avant-garde," and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
In this 1995 <em>Independent</em> article, you can read about the former CIA officer who admitted that the Agency secretly funded and promoted Abstract Expressionism as a way for avant-garde, lefty types to reconcile their worldview with American values, rather than Soviet-style Communism. They operated in secret to avoid "the public hostility to the avant-garde," and hid their actions from conservative Congressmen who hated that long-hair junk. 

<blockquote>
<p>


The decision to include culture and art in the US Cold War arsenal was taken as soon as the CIA was founded in 1947. Dismayed at the appeal communism still had for many intellectuals and artists in the West, the new agency set up a division, the Propaganda Assets Inventory, which at its peak could influence more than 800 newspapers, magazines and public information organisations. They joked that it was like a Wurlitzer jukebox: when the CIA pushed a button it could hear whatever tune it wanted playing across the world.
<p>
The next key step came in 1950, when the International Organisations Division (IOD) was set up under Tom Braden. It was this office which subsidised the animated version of George Orwell's Animal Farm, which sponsored American jazz artists, opera recitals, the Boston Symphony Orchestra's international touring programme. Its agents were placed in the film industry, in publishing houses, even as travel writers for the celebrated Fodor guides. And, we now know, it promoted America's anarchic avant-garde movement, Abstract Expressionism...
<p>


Until now there has been no first-hand evidence to prove that this connection was made, but for the first time a former case officer, Donald Jameson, has broken the silence. Yes, he says, the agency saw Abstract Expressionism as an opportunity, and yes, it ran with it.
<p>
"Regarding Abstract Expressionism, I'd love to be able to say that the CIA invented it just to see what happens in New York and downtown SoHo tomorrow!" he joked. "But I think that what we did really was to recognise the difference. It was recognised that Abstract Expression- ism was the kind of art that made Socialist Realism look even more stylised and more rigid and confined than it was. And that relationship was exploited in some of the exhibitions.
<p>
"In a way our understanding was helped because Moscow in those days was very vicious in its denunciation of any kind of non-conformity to its own very rigid patterns. And so one could quite adequately and accurately reason that anything they criticised that much and that heavy- handedly was worth support one way or another."
</blockquote>

<p>
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html">
Modern art was CIA 'weapon'
</a> [Frances Stonor Saunders/The Indepedent]
<p>
(<i>via <a href="http://kottke.org">Kottke</a></i>)

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/24/abstract-expressionism-was-a-c.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief history of space monkeys and&#160;spies</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/a-brief-history-of-space-monke.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/a-brief-history-of-space-monke.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monkeys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=213808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the late 1950s, American scientists very publicly readied a crew of monkeys for a series of trips into Earth orbit and back. As far as the researchers knew, Project Discoverer was an actual, honest-to-Ike peaceful scientific program. Naturally, they were wrong about that. In reality, their work was part of an elaborate cover-up masking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the late 1950s, American scientists very publicly readied a crew of monkeys for a series of trips into Earth orbit and back. As far as the researchers knew, Project Discoverer was an actual, honest-to-Ike peaceful scientific program. Naturally, they were wrong about that. <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/primate-diaries/2013/02/14/macaque-and-dagger-in-the-simian-space-race/">In reality, their work was part of an elaborate cover-up masking a spy satellite program</a>. At The Primate Diaries, Eric Michael Johnson reports on some fascinating space history. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/02/18/a-brief-history-of-space-monke.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fun activities for you and your nuclear&#160;warhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/fun-activities-for-you-and-you.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/fun-activities-for-you-and-you.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Skulls in the Stars blog has a funny/terrifying look at all the different uses for nuclear bombs that the United States and the Soviet Union tried to come up over the course of the Cold War. From blowing out a new harbor in Alaska, to mining, to a few less realistic ideas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Skulls in the Stars blog has <a href="http://skullsinthestars.com/2012/09/17/how-many-uses-for-a-nuclear-weapon-can-you-think-of/">a funny/terrifying look at all the different uses for nuclear bombs</a> that the United States and the Soviet Union tried to come up over the course of the Cold War. From blowing out a new harbor in Alaska, to mining, to a few less realistic ideas. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/fun-activities-for-you-and-you.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside a British Cold War&#160;bunker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/29/inside-a-british-cold-war-bunk.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/29/inside-a-british-cold-war-bunk.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=136408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Britain had been attacked by a nuclear bomb during the Cold War, its government would have survived by retreating to a massive, 35-acre complex buried beneath the county of Wiltshire. I call it a bunker in the headline, but it was more like a small town&#8212;large rooms linked by roads, built on the site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="600" height="437" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/V-bYGlijhIU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p>If Britain had been attacked by a nuclear bomb during the Cold War, its government would have survived by retreating to a massive, 35-acre complex buried beneath the county of Wiltshire. I call it a bunker in the headline, but it was more like a small town&mdash;large rooms linked by roads, built on the site of an abandoned quarry. Known as <a href="http://www.burlingtonbunker.co.uk/">Burlington</a>, it could house 4000 people and feed them all for 3 months. It was also home a broadcasting studio and hospital. </p>

<p>The whole thing was kept secret up until its decommissioning in 2004. You can take a tour in the BBC news clip above, or check out the photo galleries and interactive maps on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/wiltshire/underground_city/">the BBC's Burlington site</a>. With few upgrades since the 1960s, the place looks like a time capsule. An awesome, gigantic time capsule. It's easy to understand why the news presenter in the video is rubbing his hands together gleefully as he's about to get on the elevator to go down. I'd be excited, too!</p>

<em><p>Thanks to <a href="http://submit.boingboing.net/2011/12/abandoned-cold-war-city-uk.html">grosmarcel </a>for Submitterating, and to <a href="http://www.retronaut.co/2011/04/cold-war-city/">Retronaut</a> for posting pictures from the BBC galleries!</p></em>

<p><a href="http://youtu.be/V-bYGlijhIU">Video Link</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2011/12/29/inside-a-british-cold-war-bunk.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American cities after the nuke: 1950s tabloid&#160;illos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/17/american-cities-after-the-nuke-1950s-tabloid-illos.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/17/american-cities-after-the-nuke-1950s-tabloid-illos.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postapocalptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=113932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jake sez, "An old copy of 1950s tabloid Pageant included some amazing illustrations of what an American city would look like after an atomic bomb blast. They're both somewhat chilling and somewhat hilarious." Amazing 1950s Illustrations of American Cities Destroyed by A-Bombs (Thanks, Jake!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="http://craphound.com/images/studies_in_crap_pagaent_atomic_bomb_3.jpg" class="bordered"><br />

Jake sez, "An old copy of 1950s tabloid Pageant included some amazing illustrations of what an American city would look like after an atomic bomb blast. They're both somewhat chilling and somewhat hilarious."
<p>
<a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/exhibitionist/2011/08/studies_in_crap_a_bomb_american_cities.php">Amazing 1950s Illustrations of American Cities Destroyed by A-Bombs</a>

(<i>Thanks, <a href="http://sfweekly.com">Jake</a>!</i>)

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2011/08/17/american-cities-after-the-nuke-1950s-tabloid-illos.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
