<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boing Boing &#187; methods section</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/tag/methods-section/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Science,&#160;confidential</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/08/science-confidential.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/08/science-confidential.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behind the scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=204532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've talked here before about the crazy things you can find when you read the "Methods" section of a scientific research paper. (Ostensibly, that's the boring part.) If you want a quick laugh this morning &#8212; or if you want to get a peek at how the sausages are made &#8212; check out the Twitter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Picture-5.png"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Picture-5-600x230.png" alt="" title="Picture 5" width="600" height="230" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-204533" /></a></p>

<p>We've talked here before about <a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/10/13/two-good-reasons-to.html" title="Two Good Reasons To Always Read the Methods Section of a Scientific Paper">the crazy things you can find when you read the "Methods" section of a scientific research paper</a>. (Ostensibly, that's the boring part.)</p>

<p>If you want a quick laugh this morning &mdash; or if you want to get a peek at how the sausages are made &mdash; check out <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23overlyhonestmethods&#038;src=hash">the Twitter hashtag #overlyhonestmethods</a>, where scientists are talking about the backstory behind seemingly dry statements like "A population of male rats was chosen for this study".</p> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/01/08/science-confidential.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
