<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boing Boing &#187; myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/tag/myths/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:00:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What makes dry quicksand so&#160;deadly?</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/08/what-makes-dry-quicksand-so-de.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/08/what-makes-dry-quicksand-so-de.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explainer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invisible dangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicksand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=223526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="video-container"></div>

Dry quicksand was a mythical substance &#8212; normal-looking sand that could swallow you in a flash. That is, until 2004, when scientists made the stuff in a lab.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!--http://vimeo.com/63471076--><div class="video-container"><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/63471076" width="600" height="338" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<p>Dry quicksand was a mythical substance &mdash; normal-looking sand that could swallow you in a flash. That is, until 2004, when scientists made the stuff in a lab. (<a href="http://boingboing.net/2004/12/14/dry-deadly-quicksand.html">Mark told you about that development</a>.) </p>

<p>In this video, geologist Matt Kuchta explains how dry quicksand is different from both wet quicksand and stable sand. Hint: Think "Jenga".</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/04/08/what-makes-dry-quicksand-so-de.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla vs. Edison vs. The Myth of the Lone&#160;Inventor</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/12/tesla-vs-edison-vs-the-myth.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/12/tesla-vs-edison-vs-the-myth.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=218135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're going about this feud all wrong says Matt Novak, <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/">who blogs about techno-history at Paleofuture</a>. "The question is not: Who was a better inventor, Edison or Tesla?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We're going about this feud all wrong says Matt Novak, <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/paleofuture/">who blogs about techno-history at Paleofuture</a>. "The question is not: Who was a better inventor, Edison or Tesla? The question is: Why do we still frame the debate in this way?" Novak asked in a talk yesterday at SXSW. He's got a damn fine point. The myth of one guy who has one great idea and changes the world drastically distorts the process of innovation. Neither Tesla nor Edison invented the light bulb. Instead, the light bulb was the result of 80 years of tinkering and failure by many different people. Novak's point (and one I tend to agree with): When we buy into the myth, it gets in the way of innovation today. I've only been able to find a couple of small bits from this talk &mdash; <a href="http://txchnologist.com/post/45139747427/tesla-vs-edison-debate-ignites-at-sxsw#_=_">a write-up by Matthew Van Dusen at Txchnologist</a> and a short video from the Q&#038;A portion where <a href="http://youtu.be/qkvB0aSncuQ">Novak talks about Tesla, Edison, and the Great Man Myth with The Oatmeal's Matthew Inman</a>. But, rest assured, this is something you'll see more of at BoingBoing soon. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2013/03/12/tesla-vs-edison-vs-the-myth.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not-exactly-near-death&#160;experiences</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/not-exactly-near-death-experie.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/not-exactly-near-death-experie.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d'oh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=195302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1990, researchers investigated the stories of 58 people who had had a near-death experience during surgery. Turns out,<a href="http://mindhacks.com/2008/11/10/the-not-very-near-death-experience/"> 30 of those people were never actually near-death, at all</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In 1990, researchers investigated the stories of 58 people who had had a near-death experience during surgery. Turns out,<a href="http://mindhacks.com/2008/11/10/the-not-very-near-death-experience/"> 30 of those people were never actually near-death, at all</a>. They just thought they were. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/not-exactly-near-death-experie.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tired? You&#039;re not filled with tryptophan, but with&#160;food</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/tired-youre-not-filled-with.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/tired-youre-not-filled-with.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Koerth-Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tryptophan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=195253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhere around the late 1990s, blaming tryptophan consumption for post-Thanksgiving lethargy became as much of a holiday tradition as the food itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!--http://youtu.be/0rHLxC6ILno--><div class="video-container"><iframe width="600" height="338" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0rHLxC6ILno?fs=1&#038;showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<p>

Somewhere around the late 1990s, blaming tryptophan consumption for post-Thanksgiving lethargy became as much of a holiday tradition as the food itself. This amino acid &mdash; present in turkey meat &mdash; is supposed to accumulate in your brain, prompting your body to use it to make extra serotonin, a chemical that can make you feel sleepy.</p>

<p>But, as this RiskBites video and a very excellent article by Matt Shipman both explain, there's actually a simpler explanation for the sleepiness you feel after eating two helpings of turkey, trimmings, and pie. Simply put: You ate too damn much.</p>

<blockquote><p>Many people gorge themselves at the Thanksgiving table. During the resultant digestive process, the body diverts as much as 50 percent of its blood to the small intestine, to maximize absorption of calories and nutrients. That means there is less blood available for physical activity. Furthermore, most traditional Thanksgiving meals are high in fat and protein content, which actually slows down the digestive process. So your body is going to be diverting blood to the small intestine for a longer period of time.</p></blockquote>

<p>Unfortunately, pointing this out to the family members sprawled on your living room furniture will not make you sound nearly as clever as the tryptophan myth does. And the bit about the blood flow to the intestine might get you (slowly, sluggishly) lynched. Maybe, instead, you can just recommend a nice walk. </p>

<p><a href="http://web.ncsu.edu/abstract/science/turkey-day/">Read the rest of Matt Shipman's piece on tryptophan</a>, including an interaction between mashed potatoes and turkey that could, conceivably, cause tryptophan-induced sleepiness. 

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/20/tired-youre-not-filled-with.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
