<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boing Boing &#187; The Avengers 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/tag/the-avengers-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do all roads lead to the Wasp in Iron Man 3 (and The Avengers&#160;2)?</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/wasp-avengers-rumors.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/wasp-avengers-rumors.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Frevele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ant-Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Man 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Avengers 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally, I would never post about a nebulous movie rumor, but the potential for discussion and mystery is so cool that I couldn't resist. It concerns the possible cinematic introduction of one of the actual, original founding members of the Avengers from the Marvel comics: Janet van Dyne, aka the Wasp. Rumors concerning the Wasp [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/the-wasp.jpg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/the-wasp.jpg" alt="" title="the-wasp" width="350" height="249" class="alignright size-full wp-image-194369" /></a>Normally, I would never post about a nebulous movie rumor, but the potential for discussion and mystery is so cool that I couldn't resist. It concerns the possible cinematic introduction of one of the actual, <a href="http://marvel.com/universe/Wasp">original founding members</a> of the Avengers from the Marvel comics: Janet van Dyne, aka the Wasp. Rumors concerning the Wasp in the first Avengers movie <a href="http://screenrant.com/eva-longoria-wasp-avengers-rob-70426/">definitely existed</a> before they were squashed, but lately, we've been treated to <a href="http://screenrant.com/iron-man-3-wasp/">a bunch of hints</a> that might actually make this a credible subject for speculation. </p>

<p>So, why bother doing an entire post about speculation? The stakes are high, if you've been hoping for more Marvel heroines on the big screen, especially one with superpowers who could also be in <em>The Avengers 2</em>. It's also just so irresistibly old-school Marvel. Let's look at some of the evidence that might just point to the Wasp.<span id="more-194229"></span>

	<li><strong>Item 1:</strong> A major factor driving the Wasp rumors is the prominence of Stephanie Szostak's name in the official synopsis for <em>Iron Man 3</em> -- she's billed sixth in the cast list, though her role, thus far, is unnamed. (She also appears for a moment in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_h95mEd4TI">the trailer</a>, as the woman shoving Tony Stark against the wall at about 1:06.)</li>


	<li><strong>Item 2:</strong> We've seen glimpses of possible connecting elements for <a href="http://news.moviefone.com/2012/09/24/kevin-feige-marvel-studios-interview_n_1909321.html">Marvel's "Phase 2" roll-out</a>, including <a href="http://marvel.com/universe/A.I.M.">A.I.M.</a>, or Advanced Idea Mechanics, the fictional company included in <a href="http://www.geekrest.com/2012/06/iron-man-3-set-photos-aim-organization-marvel-cinematic-universe/">set photos</am> from <em>Iron Man 3</em> (as well as <a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/2012-FAN-EXPO-COMIC-CON-EXCLUSIVE-IRON-MAN-3-AIM-Movie-PROMO-SHIRT-T-Shirt-L-/320986918815?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_2&#038;hash=item4abc4faf9f&#038;ssPageName=RSS:B:SHOP:US:101">promotional tee-shirts</a> at San Diego Comic Con) that is also rumored to appear in <em>Ant-Man</em>. So, logic tells us: 

<blockquote>If A.I.M. and Szostak are in <em>Iron Man 3</em>, and A.I.M. is in <em>Ant-Man</em>, and Ant-Man founded the Avengers with the Wasp, then Szostak must be the Wasp.</blockquote>

It's a <em>big</em> reach, but it's a fun reach, and there's a common denominator (A.I.M., which actually points more towards M.O.D.O.K. than the Wasp).</li>

	<li><strong>Item 3:</strong> The most explicit hints, including the involvement of A.I.M. in <em>Ant-Man</em>, come from a mysterious Twitter user named <a href="https://twitter.com/RogerWardell">Roger Wardell</a>, who claims to have inside information on everything Marvel -- but <a href="http://geekasms.com/blog/2012/09/07/who-is-roger-wardell-an-insider-to-marvels-upcoming-films/">no one</a> <a href="http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/twitter-account-roger-wardell-spills-beans-marvel-studios-movies-spoilers">knows</a> who he really is. So, consider that permission to be <em>very</em> skeptical. That said, Wardell posted <a href="https://twitter.com/RogerWardell/status/268091419334414336">a tweet recently</a> about how the revelation of Szostak's role in <em>Iron Man 3</em> will cause fans to "go crazy." Have any of his "bombshells" panned out? Actually, yes, though it's a <strong>spoilery</strong> one -- two tweets, <a href="https://twitter.com/RogerWardell/status/230575470956118017">one from August</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/RogerWardell/status/243475185821429760">another from September</a>, have mentioned (spoiler text ahoy) <span style="color:white">Pepper Potts putting on the Iron Man armor.</span> This was <a href="http://www.bleedingcool.com/2012/11/09/pepper-potts-gets-her-own-iron-man-3-spoiler-plus-more-new-details/">confirmed by Marvel</a> this week. So, <em>maybe</em> there's something to this Wardell character.</li>
	<li><strong>Item 4:</strong> ComicBook.com also received <a href="http://comicbook.com/blog/2012/11/13/iron-man-3-rumor-stephanie-szostak-to-play-the-wasp/">an anonymous tip</a> that claimed, flat-out, that Szostak would be playing the Wasp. But that might be slightly too shady -- or is it? In context, it might make all the sense in the world.</li>
<li><strong>Item 5:</strong> Ant-Man, the other founding member of the Avengers (and the Wasp's love interest), <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/ant-man-coming-in-2014.html">is getting his own movie</a> with Edgar Wright at the helm, possibly as soon as 2014. At this point, not having the Wasp on board would seem like a conspicuous omission, don't you think?</li>

<p>As I said, these are all theories and rumors, based on tidbits of information that may or may not be related. Not to mention that all we really have to go on is that Stephanie Szostak is a female actor in a Marvel movie. There are tons of characters she could be playing -- but the Wasp is looking pretty good. </p>

<p><a href="http://screenrant.com/iron-man-3-wasp/">Rumor Patrol: Iron Man 3 To Introduce The Wasp?</a> [Screen Rant]</p>

<p><em>Photo credit: <a href="http://marvel.com/universe/Wasp">Marvel</a></em></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/wasp-avengers-rumors.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Marvel&#039;s Joss Whedon news, including how he&#039;s now involved with basically everything through&#160;2015</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/08/more-marvel-joss-whedon.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/08/more-marvel-joss-whedon.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Frevele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joss Whedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Avengers 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=175332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday brought the exciting, but not at all unexpected news that Joss Whedon will return to write and direct the sequel to this year's superhero success The Avengers. While that's basically the gist of it, there is a little bit more information coming out about his involvement in not just Avengers 2, but also a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/josswhedon_avengers.jpg"><img src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/josswhedon_avengers.jpg" alt="" title="josswhedon_avengers" width="600" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-175334" /></a></p>

<p>Yesterday brought the exciting, but not at all unexpected news that <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/08/07/breaking-joss-whedon-avengers.html">Joss Whedon will return</a> to write and direct the sequel to this year's superhero success <em>The Avengers</em>. While that's basically the gist of it, there is a little bit more information coming out about his involvement in not just <em>Avengers 2</em>, but also a live-action Marvel TV series for ABC and further contributions to other Marvel movies. I think this is what happens when you make a bunch of cult shows that get canceled before they should, and then karma repays you generously. Or shawarma. One of those things.</p><span id="more-175332"></span>

<p>Here is the <a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/08/07/joss-whedon-avengers-sequel/">official statement</a> from Marvel Studios:</p>

<blockquote>“Joss Whedon has signed an exclusive deal with Marvel Studios for film and television through the end of June 2015. As part of that deal, Whedon will write and direct Marvel’s <em>The Avengers 2</em> as well as help develop a new live action series for Marvel Television at ABC. He will also contribute creatively to the next phase of Marvel’s cinematic universe.”</blockquote>

<p>It's probably safe to say that the <em>Avengers</em> thing was a given. But now Whedon will be involved with the other Marvel movies? Like <em>Guardians of the Galaxy</em>, <em>Ant-Man</em>, the sequels to <em>Thor</em> and <em>Captain America</em>? Maybe his contributions will only serve to tie everything together, like the post-credits scenes that led up to <em>The Avengers</em>. Or maybe he'll be in charge of a series of "one shot" short films, like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gog0_GKYpIg"><em>Item 47</em></a>, which will be on the Blu-ray for <em>The Avengers</em>. Whatever he's doing, it's reassuring news that Whedon is officially on board.</p>

<p>Now, about this live-action TV series. It just so happens that there is already a Marvel TV series in the very early stages of development -- Guillermo del Toro's <em>Hulk</em> series. It also just so happens that del Toro was hinting at <a href="http://collider.com/guillermo-del-toro-hulk-the-wolverine-interview/186970/">a very big name writer</a> for this show following a meeting with Marvel:</p>

<blockquote>I had one meeting with Marvel after <em>Avengers</em> and we had a very, very good chat. We have a writer that we want to bring on board, a very, very concrete name. I can't reveal it, but we want to wait for that writer. It's a writer who is otherwise engaged. So right now we are in a holding pattern until that writer becomes free. Then we're going to do a new draft of the script.</blockquote>

<p>Well, that's curious, isn't it? It's pure speculation, so don't take it as any species of fact or truth, but it's certainly interesting. It's also probably more likely that Whedon has been marinating his own ideas for a while now (::coughcough::Black Widow series::coughcough::), and now he has all this Marvel clout (and money) to make it happen. </p>

<p>As of right now, all we know for sure is that Joss Whedon is Marvel's right-hand man until June 2015. And I doubt anyone will be complaining about <em>that</em>.</p>

<p><a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/08/07/joss-whedon-avengers-sequel/">Joss Whedon on board for 'Avengers' sequel, working on Marvel-based TV show</a> [EW]</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/08/more-marvel-joss-whedon.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scarlett Johansson: $20 Million For The Avengers&#160;2</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/11/scarlett-johansson-20-million.html</link>
		<comments>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/11/scarlett-johansson-20-million.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Frevele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millions of dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarlett johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Avengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Avengers 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=170454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The New York Post, Scarlett Johansson will become Hollywood's highest-paid woman, snagging a cool $20 million paycheck for assembling for the sequel to this spring's humble, low-budget sleeper hit The Avengers. This will mean that for her supporting role -- because there was no official lead in the ensemble superhero flick -- she [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Black-Widow.jpg"><img class="aligncenter bordered size-full wp-image-170498" src="http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Black-Widow.jpg" alt="" width="600" /></a></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/carjo_makes_em_pay_L0mkRs7JnfdyusTlYygEWN">The New York Post</a>, Scarlett Johansson will become Hollywood's highest-paid woman, snagging a cool $20 million paycheck for assembling for the sequel to this spring's humble, low-budget sleeper hit <em>The Avengers</em>. This will mean that for her supporting role -- because there was no official lead in the ensemble superhero flick -- she will receive one million more dollars than Angelina Jolie made for her lead role in <em>The Tourist</em>, which was a colossal flop and a <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/blogs/the-travers-take/the-tourist-most-laughable-of-the-golden-globe-noms-20101215">running joke</a> at the Golden Globes in 2011. Does this mean more screen time for the Black Widow? Does it mean shawarma every night of the week? Is she making anywhere near what Robert Downey Jr. will make? (Answer to that: No, but no one is, really.) <span id="more-170454"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.eonline.com/news/328904/avengers-sequel-is-scarlett-johansson-banking-a-20-million-payday-not-so-fast">E! is saying</a> this might just be a rumor, that such a paycheck has not been confirmed by Johansson's reps. But that doesn't necessarily mean that $20 million is that unreasonable, at least by Hollywood standards. For one thing, Scarlett Johansson is what the kids call "like, super famous." And people who are super famous make super amounts of money. Think back to the mid-1990s when Jim Carrey was super famous, at the apex of his career, and became the highest paid comedy actor in Hollywood by getting $20 million (in 1995 dollars!) for <em>The Cable Guy</em>. (A movie that is <em>excellent</em>, by the way.) People thought that was insane! But $20 million now is practically pocket change for The Famous, except when it isn't. Sometimes it's a big deal, like when it's breaking records. Julia Roberts broke that <a href="http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/julia-roberts-collects-20-million-for-erin-brockovich">record-slash-glass ceiling</a> after she kicked all that ass in <em>Erin Brokovich</em> back in 2000.</p>
<p>Mostly, if this $20 million paycheck is true, it's a generous raise from the $400,000 Johansson received for her first appearance as Black Widow in <em>Iron Man 2</em>. "We liked you that much, and we also <em>made</em> that much, so let's go ahead and make sure you come back so we can recreate all the good times we had." [<em>Not an actual quote, just an imagined scenario.</em>]</p>
<p>For a comparison, Robert Downey Jr. will probably end up with <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/marvel-moolah-robert-downey-jr-avengers-iron-man-324639">over $50 million</a> for the first movie (that's including box office bonuses, backend compensation, etc. not just the initial paycheck). The rest of the cast -- Mark Ruffalo, Chris Evans, Jeremy Renner, and Chris Hemsworth -- all agreed to relatively small salaries plus bonuses and will make $2-3 million each. Johansson and Samuel L. Jackson actually got about twice that much, plus bonuses. However, in addition to Johansson, everyone will likely get themselves a hefty, hefty raise for the sequel.</p>
<p>But if you really want to stick someone with the bar tab, make it Johnny Depp, who made an estimated $250 million on all the <em>Pirates of the Caribbean</em> movies.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/carjo_makes_em_pay_L0mkRs7JnfdyusTlYygEWN">New York Post</a> via <a href="http://blastr.com/2012/07/johanssons-avengers-2-pay.php">Blastr</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/11/scarlett-johansson-20-million.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
