The Guestbar!
A tiny, guest-edited blog!

Rudy Rucker

Rudy Rucker is a writer, a mathematician and a computer scientist. Born in Kentucky in 1946, Rucker moved to Silicon Valley when he turned 40. Rucker has published twenty-five books, primarily science-fiction and popular science. He was an early cyberpunk and an editor at Mondo 2000. He often writes SF in a style is characterized as transreal. His most recent novels were Frek and the Elixir, a far-future epic about a boy's galactic quest to restore Earth's ecology and As Above So Below, a historical novel based on the life of the sixteenth century painter Peter Bruegel.  Rucker is a professor emeritus of computer science at San Jose State University, where he created a number of freeware programs relating to chaos, artificial life, cellular automata, higher dimensions, and computer games. He is presently working on The Lifebox, the Seashell and the Soul, a nonfiction book about computers and the nature of reality. Rucker's website can be found at www.cs.sjsu.edu/faculty/rucker or at www.rudyrucker.com.


I wrote a blog entry about Kinja over at O'Reilly. I think what they are doing is important, but I have some concerns on how it will work over time.

Which leads me to a few interesting facts about my new book Never Threaten To Eat Your Co-Workers: Best of Blogs.

-Approximately 30,000 entries were read. Of that number, about 170 entries were initially selected to be in the book, while the final count came out to 67 entries total.

-When we initially started collecting the entries, we were using an online forum (not my idea). What's funny is that it had a profanity filter on it. So I think this may be the world's first book edited for profanity in reverse. We had to go back to insert cursing.

-We knew that we'd have to make some cuts due to page count restrictions. So, I assembled a team of three advisors to read and rate the content on a scale of 1-5, five being the highest. Only one entry of the approx. 170 received a perfect rating of five. Will I ever reveal which one? The bidding starts at...

-And the best fact of all is that when I had collected all the material, I did a little calculation and found that over 60% of the material was from women bloggers. What a fantastic surprise. I think it is great to see such diversity in a medium which is typically dominated by men. Another interesting little factoid was that women were far more verbal and descriptive. They rarely made entries about like, uh, you know...Quake and stuff. Their content was richer and more detailed than their male counterparts. I also noticed that quite a few men were reading and linking to blogs written by women. I hope to see this trend continue, because it sets the bar higher for everyone.

I'd also like to see a study done about this...

Here are some entries from some of my favorite women of the web.

Keely St. Claire: Only I Didn't say Fudge

Claire Robertson: This Could Happen To You

Paula Abilheira: The Sanctity of the Bathroom Experience

Melanie Wilson: Walk on the Wild Side

LJC: Election Day (note there are some broken image links, be sure to visit her index page as well)

posted by Alan Graham at 11:31:48 PM | permalink


The genius of Andy Kaufman was that the joke was on us. He was able to blur the line between reality and perception, so he always kept us guessing. I was still a young child during some of his more provocative stunts. Even then I just loved him. I think the innocence of that age allowed me to see something that was masked to the adults around me.

Well if Andy were alive today (and perhaps he is), he'd be behind Landover Baptist Church. This is clearly the absolute best parody site on the web. Hands down. It is so brilliant, that it takes you literally hours to figure out it is a parody. And yet, you are always left wondering.

While the entire site is a parody, the funniest joke of all is the joke on us. You totally see the brilliance of the joke when you open their mailbag and take a peek at what is inside. There are two types of letters. One type is from moderates and non-religious people who are appalled and disgusted because it confirms everything they believe to be true about the religious right. The other is from the right who are offended because Landover makes Jerry Falwell look like Hillary Clinton. The brilliance is that both sides unintentionally write the absolute funniest letters, which really show the true nature and ignorance of humanity.

Go check out the mail for yourself, but here are a few excerpts to whet your whistle.

"Dear Landover, I laugh at your ignorance. I have religious friends and I must say that if Jesus existed today, he would have wanted love. What are you people? You're hateful "Holier than thou" morons."

"Please tell me you are joking. This site -and consiquently your ideas of a spanking- is a blasphamos. Feel free to post this on your cite (though i'm sure you won't)."

"Are you people really serious with this garbage? You encourage parents to beat their kids with a Bible and call them "sissies" and "demons"? Where the hell do you get off with that bullshit? We're all worried about terrorists in the middle east, while we have all these Christian terrorists right here at home. You are sick and full of hate and ignorance. Your scare tactics don't work on me."

This is choice:
"you folks are an the brink of demon posession yourselvers... Nothing but blasphemy is on your crappy website. Turn aside from your evil ways, loved ones. I do know you know Jesus, but pastor, this is for you! Quit building upon yuour weak foundation so as not to be one" barley escaping through the flames." Remember, as ministers especially, the blood of the lost will be on our hands. Reach out in love, not hateful scare tactics. Oh, and by the way, I am NOT a liberal.
Please respond back to mattvan77@yahoo.com
Matthew John Van Vleet
Chicago Outreach Ministries

But this one really takes the cake...oh man is this the best...I mean I'm a geek but this guy...

"Your scathing review of Return of The King was laughably ignorant, and one would think that persons responsible for showing a film to a congregation, and for writing/publishing articles on it would do a little research before risking the destruction of a five-million dollar theatre at the hands of enraged congregants (although, in any case, thier reaction was appalling). Had anyone bothered to Google "return of the king" you would have litany of resources at your fingertips describing exactly what it was - the last installment of a three-part book entitled "The Lord Of The Rings," its three parts being "The Fellowship of the Ring," "The Two Towers," and finally, "The Return of the King." This book was written by renowned author J.R.R. Tolkien as a follow-up to The Hobbit, and was first published in 1956. It has since been republished in countless edition and formats since then, and has become one of the most loved and treasured books of all time, the world over. Tolkien himself was a devout Christian, and ingrained His faith into the story. December of 2001 marked the release of the first film, The Fellowship of the Ring, with The Two Towers following one year later, and as you know, The Return of The King premiering this past December. Had you seen the first two films, you would have known the the Ring was a device created by the Dark Lord Sauron (yes, Dark Lord) to contain his power, and that the King was Aragorn, the heir of Isildor, who was King of Gondor before Sauron began to plunge the world into darkness. Since no heir came forward, Gondor had no king until Aragorn came forward - hence the return of the king. Sauron is NOT the portrayal of God in this story, he is the most powerful of Satan's demons, if not Satan himself. The Hobbits, the Dwarves, the Elves, and the Men were all working together in an epic battle against Sauron and his armies of Orcs and Urukai (demons), to defeat Evil. Destroying the Ring was paramount to the success of this battle, and was not an act against God, but against Satan. The slightest bit of research would have told you all of this, and as you are in a position of leadership and teaching, research is necessary, and it is neglegent on your part not to have done it. Or perhaps you did, but you want your community to believe that anything made outside of it is completely evil. Is that how you maintain control?"

I'm crying I'm laughing so hard.

Andy would be so proud.

posted by Alan Graham at 12:15:28 AM | permalink


Heads up...

The new liberal radio network, Air America, launches today at 12pm EST. I'm personally a big fan of Randi Rhodes who will be handling the late afternoon/early evening slot. She's an intelligent 20 year radio veteran who deserves a national audience. Her time slot is from 3pm to 7pm...a full four hours. She's the perfect antidote to people who use insults instead of arguments.

If you are interested in tuning in, apparently there will be a webcast here.

Quick Update: One step forward for broadcasting...one step back for webcasting. Apparently they have underestimated their expected traffic, and it is almost impossible to keep a constant connection. From bad to worse...it seems they've chosen the insidiously bad Real Player for their audio stream. Sigh...let's hope they take a hint from Car Talk, although I'd prefer a Quicktime stream.

Let's hope they fix it by tomorrow.

posted by Alan Graham at 8:06:36 AM | permalink


I love Ray Bradbury. Favorite writer, hands down. The reason I love his work is that Bradbury knows enough to pull back and let the reader fill in the blanks. He understands that the readers own imagination is the most powerful literary tool there is. If there is a monster in the darkened hall, Bradbury let's you make it your own...allows you to give life to that which lives in the darkest parts of your mind.

Now if you've ever watched one of the CSI programs, you are no doubt aware that they tend to be quite graphic. But there is something about the way the material is presented that numbs us to it's graphic nature. Our minds just absorb what we see, but don't really engage us in the story. Seeing the recreation of a bullet tear through flesh is not engaging drama. The intent is simply to shock you.

Enter Autopsy Report: Log of experiences as a Medical Examiner Intern. Our host, Brian, takes us through his daily experiences in the morgue. Now comes my Bradbury Word of Warning. Although there are no images, this site is very candid and descriptive. And unlike CSI, here we are left to our own mental devices. If you have a good imagination, but a weak consitution, then this site is not for you. But if you want to take a fascinating look into the real world of life and death, then I highly recommend you dig through it. You'll find strong material, presented honestly, and intelligently. You'll also find a good collection of medical and forensic links.

"A man was shot twice, once in the neck and once in the abdomen. How did the doctor know that the neck shot came first?"

Find the answer to this query here.

"...it is the talent of a pathologist and morgue personnel to be able to describe things in terms of food - you will never look at food the same way..."

From a particularly descriptive entry on decomps.

If you learn anything from this site...learn to take care of yourself...and as Mom always said...wear clean underwear.

posted by Alan Graham at 11:14:00 PM | permalink


The Atheist Jesus Poetry Contest

or

Cass Brown Will Die For Your Blog

Regardless of your personal religious beliefs, one of the more interesting sites in the blogosphere happens to be called The Raving Atheist, An Aesthetic Examination of the Culture of Belief: How Religious Devotion Trivializes American Law and Politics.

As you might have guessed, it is run by an atheist. Whether you are a person of faith or not, what draws me to the site is the often heated arguments that occur in the comments section. The acerbic wit of the author never fails to spark a contentious debate, and The Raving Atheist does not suffer fools lightly. It is a thinking person's site, and well written to boot.

But this leads me to another site which is connected to The Raving Atheist. Cancergiggles is a site run by Cass Brown, an atheist who is terminally ill with colon cancer that has spread to his lungs, liver and pelvis. He only has about 6-18 months left to live. It is a touching site, and as someone who lost their mother to cancer when I was 12, I find his courage to laugh in the face of death inspiring. But I digress.

Together The Raving Atheist and Cass Brown are running the Atheist Jesus Poetry Contest. I kid you not. Cass Brown will die for your blog, provided you win the contest.

As the winner, your site (or a blog of your choosing) will earn the exclusive right to boast that “Cass Brown Died for this Blog.” Cass will prominently display the honor at his blog, together with the winning submission. The Raving Atheist will do the same, and will place your blog’s name at the top of his blogroll under the special category “The Blog that Cass Brown Died For.”

Says Cass, "It is my intention, as I indicated before, to be as un-cooperative as possible regarding the expected delivery date of the prize.

Rules can be found here, but hurry, entries must be in by April 2.

posted by Alan Graham at 10:54:00 PM | permalink


I enjoy all types of blogs, but in the past two years I've read a number of entries that had some type of profound impact on me, and I can't exactly explain why. This is why blogging is such a major revolution in literature. Instead of some company deciding what is of value to me, I make that decision on my own.

The first time I read this piece by Sarah Hatter, I was dumbstruck. It worked on so many levels, that I had to read it again and again. It's been six months and I still think about it. The idea of condensing your feelings for another person into an Excel spreadsheet, was brilliant...like a scene from a movie...however, when you get beyond the surface, you can identify with the feelings expressed beyond the novelty. There is this this moment towards the end, and no matter your age or sex...this feeling is always the same for everyone.

"I opened my Inbox and found the last email he had written me (dated Aug 21) and without reading it, knowing all too well what it said, I hit Reply and changed the subject field from "Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:" to "FYI." It took nearly an hour to decide on a subject title, I hesitated because the subject is the most important part, it's the part that chooses for him whether he'll read the rest, whether he'll open it at all."

Who hasn't experienced the self deprecating, obsessive doubt of an early relationship with someone you are really fond of? Should I? Could I? What will they think? ARRRGGHHHH!

Read it...then enjoy this:

Eyelash

posted by Alan Graham at 10:01:04 AM | permalink


Greetings fellow boing boing fans!

Two years ago I realized that I was spending more and more time reading blogs, and less and less time reading magazines and books. Not because there wasn't any compelling content on the shelves, but I was finding so much great content in blogs. While everyone was talking about blogs and the revolution of big-J journalism, I was trying to convince the NYC publishing elite that the next great source of literature would be found in blogs. I pitched the idea of a series that took the best blog content and collected it into different topical books. I was turned down by no less than 10 major agents/publishers. To quote one source:

“I just think that not enough people care about blogs to make this bigger than a small anthology of unknown writers.”

Thank goodness I have no respect for authority. I didn't give up and finally found a publisher willing to take a chance. I enlisted the help of my Co-Editor Bonnie Burton, and 30,000 entries (read) later, we have the first book:

Never Threaten To Eat Your Co-Workers: Best of Blogs.

It is an anthology of some of the best entries from around the blogosphere.

You can read all about the book at:

http://bestblogs.blogdns.com or jump right to the Read Me.

We really need your help with this book. Every sale is a salvo across the deck of the literary elite. Not only do we send a message that blogs are viable, but each blogger in the book is an equal partner in the royalties. Your purchase helps support our community.

I'm not adverse to begging, but here are 10 reasons to buy the book.

As for my guest blog, I thought it would be fun to show you some of my favorite blog content from around the blogosphere.

posted by Alan Graham at 12:00:15 AM | permalink


Guestbar Archives