Freedom of the Press Foundation recently filed a huge brief in the organization's case demanding that the Justice Department release its secret rules for targeting journalists with National Security Letters. And in related news, a coalition of 37 news organizations – including the New York Times, The Associated Press, USA Today, Buzzfeed, and tons more – filed an amicus brief in support of the Freedom of the Press Foundation case, demanding that the Department of Justice do the same.
I am a proud member of the Freedom of the Press Foundation Board of Directors.
The organization's Director Trevor Timm writes:
A coalition of thirty-seven of news organizations—including the New York Times, the Associated Press, NPR, USA Today, and Buzzfeed—filed a legal brief over the weekend in support of Freedom of the Press Foundation's case demanding that the Justice Department release its secret rules for targeting journalists with National Security Letters (NSLs).
NSLs are controversial (and unconstitutional) surveillance tools that allow the FBI to collect private information in national security cases without any involvement whatsoever from judges or courts. We filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in 2015 demanding their secret rules for using NSLs on members of the media, and Reporter's Committee for Freedom of the Press filed the amicus brief on behalf of the thirty seven news organization on Saturday. (We also filed a separate brief, which you can read below.)
The case stems from 2013, when it was revealed that the Justice Department secretly spied on journalists at the Associated Press and Fox News in separate leak investigations. After a large public backlash when the surveillance was finally made public, the Justice Department announced an update to their "media guidelines," which supposedly puts strict rules on how and when the US government can spy on journalists' emails and phone calls to investigate leaks.
While these new media guidelines cover subpoenas, court orders and warrants, the Justice Department curiously exempted National Security Letters from the rules altogether, claiming in the New York Times that NSLs aimed at the press were subject to a separate—but secret—"strict legal regime."
In response to our lawsuit, the Justice Department released to us some documents in December 2015 that confirmed that these secret rules do, in fact, exist. However the agency refused to release the specific rules or even acknowledge where the actual rules are located—even though we already know they appear in the classified annex of the FBI's Department Investigations and Operations Guide, which is published in redacted form on the FBI's website.
You can clearly see the section where they are located here:
By exempting National Security Letters (and potentially FISA court orders) from their media guidelines, the Justice Department makes a mockery of the supposed restrictions. Because almost every leak investigation involving the media involves national security, the FBI and DOJ can simply use NSLs to freely get much of the information they would otherwise need to comply with strict rules to get—all in complete secrecy and without any oversight.
We hope the Justice Department will agree with us that these rules should have never been secret in the first place and release them promptly. Though since they have already asked the judge to dismiss our lawsuit, we expect to be arguing this case in court later this summer.