/ Boing Boing / 10 am Tue, Jul 30 2013
  • Submit
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise here
  • Forums
  • Bradley Manning found not guilty of aiding enemy, but convicted on lesser charges, faces up to 136 years

    Bradley Manning found not guilty of aiding enemy, but convicted on lesser charges, faces up to 136 years

    Pvt. Bradley Manning was found not guilty of aiding the enemy today, but convicted on multiple lesser counts, including violating the Espionage Act.

    Twenty to thirty supporters, wearing black tee shirts emblazoned with the word "Truth", were in the courtroom alongside eight reporters. There were no outbursts as the verdict was read.

    The verdict was read by Justice Col. Denise Lind at 1 p.m. EST, who presided over Manning's trial and deliberated over the weekend after closing arguments wrapped late last week. The sentencing phase will begin tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.

    Manning did not look surprised, and smiled briefly after the verdict. His attorney appeared resigned, as if expecting the outcome. Though cleared on the most serious charge, Manning still faces a maximum possible sentence of 136 years, according to an Army legal expert who briefed reporters after the verdict. But he could receive less, due in part to guilty pleas entered on some counts.

    Pvt. Manning, accused of leaking a massive trove of classified information to Wikileaks, spent the last three years in custody awaiting his day in court. Described as a whistleblower or traitor, depending on whom you ask, his disclosures--including some 750,000 pages of documents and a video of civilian killings in Iraq--were calculated to expose wrongdoing by the U.S. Government.

    "I believed if the public was aware of the data, it would start a public debate of the wars," Manning said in a statement given at the trial.

    Prosecutors, however, accused him of being a "fame-hungry traitor" and forcing the withdrawal of ambassadors from diplomatically sensitive regions.

    Manning reported trying to provide the information first to U.S. newspapers, but he reported that a Washington Post reporter brushed him off and that the New York Times simply ignored it. Both newspapers--like many others--gave the revelations significant coverage after they were published by Wikileaks, the clearing house for leaks.

    He was turned in by Adrian Lamo, a correspondent to whom he disclosed his activites in a series of internet chats. Manning, 25, born in Crescent, Oklahoma, was arrested in May, 2010, while serving in Iraq.

    — Xeni Jardin and Rob Beschizza


    / / /

    Notable Replies

    1. Lion says:

      He had between five and ten charges of the espionage act levied against him. It's still a life sentence if the judge goes consecutively on it. And he already got at least 20 years for the earlier plea deals. He's still not likely to leave Leavenworth alive.

    2. Poor brave bastard. With any luck in the near-ish future we'll have a president not completely enthralled with the national surveillance apparatus who'll commute his sentence; such a shame that Obama isn't that president.

      Also, Adrian Lamo deserves to have his bed short-sheeted every night for the rest of his life. What a dick.

    3. Lion says:

      Well, it's up in the air on whether or not that was something that was permanant or a passing fad or some attempt to get sectioned out of the military.

      His own lawyers refer to him as Bradley. I'm going with that.

    4. You have got to be kidding me. The government tortures him, charges him with everything under the Sun to intimidate him and force him to plea bargain, tries to hold the trial in secrecy, abuses reporters who don't toe the government line, and does this all for the purpose of intimidating reporters and leakers, yet you still want to blame him for this? You don't get it. This is bigger than him. The government isn't hitting him with a sledgehammer because he damaged national security. He didn't. They are hitting him because he exposed their lies and they now want to shoot a shot across the bow of any potential leaker or journalist. They want everybody to know that the government will not be held accountable for its crimes, and that it will use its full power to see that this remains the case.

    Continue the discussion bbs.boingboing.net

    32 more replies