In 2009, Obama signed an executive order requiring the administrative branch to embrace the broadest, most liberal approach to the Freedom of Information Act, reversing John Ashcroft's 2001 memo that instructed government agencies to turn over as little information to the public as possible.
At the time, I published a column in Make magazine lauding the decision:
John Ashcroft, then Attorney General, issued a directive to government
agencies on October 12, 2001 that gutted FOIA. Under the new directive,
agencies were advised to deny all FOIA requests, unless there was a
"sound legal basis" for complying with them. Prior to this, agencies had
defaulted to honoring *all* FOIA requests, unless there was some
"foreseeable harm" that could come from them. Effectively Ashcroft's
memo changed FOIA policy to, "We'll honor your FOIA request — after you
win a lawsuit against us."
So it was a grand and exciting day for activists of all description
when, on January 21, 2009, Barack Obama issued a memo *reversing* this
policy, directing government agencies to "adopt a presumption in favor
of disclosure" — that is, to change the government's default position
on revealing what it doing from "None of your business" to "Pull up a
seat and let me tell you all about it.:"
Make: magazine was founded on the principle that, "if you can't open it,
you don't own it," the stirring opening lines to Mr Jalopy's infamous
Maker's Manifesto. This is even more true of governments than it is of
gadgets. Governments do their business on our behalf, with our money, in
our country. There's never a good reason for the government to keep its
everyday workings a secret from the people who own it: the citizenry.
Secrecy in government breeds waste, corruption and insecurity.
And President Obama went even further than this: the January 21 memo
tells agencies that they "should not wait for specific requests from the
public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens
about what is known and done by their Government. Disclosure should be
What's this mean for you? Well, it means that from here on in,
government is in the open data business. From now on, the daily workings
of your government are supposed to be an open book. That's fine news
indeed for makers: time to get cracking on the services and systems that
make that mountain of data into something meaningful.
(At least one Republican Make subscriber wrote an angry letter to the editor denouncing me and canceling his subscription over this — he literally tore my column out of the magazine and sent it to the publisher with "It's this b.s. that confirms for this is my last issue" scrawled over the page in black marker)
Obama's promises turned out to be mostly hollow: after promising "the most transparent administration" in US history, he ended up presiding over one of the most secretive ones, featuring an historic war on whistleblowers that invoked the Espionage Act more than all the US presidential administrations in history, combined.
But now, finally, we may be seeing the first inkling of the open government that Obama grandly promised. Last week both houses of Congress passed the Open, Public, Electronic, and Necessary Government Data Act (AKA the OPEN Government Data Act), which mandates that:
1. public information should be open by default to the public in a machine-readable format, where such publication doesn't harm privacy or security; and
2. federal agencies should use evidence when they make public policy.
The bill — which was exemplary in its original form — was somewhat neutered before it passed, carving out government agencies save those defined by the CFO Act and "data that does not concern monetary policy" (meaning that Treasury is exempted from this presumption of openness).
Despite the carve-outs, this is still a big deal — and it's hard to say what makes it a bigger deal: the open data or the mandate for evidence-based policy. The administration's expert agencies, like the FCC, are already required to work on the basis of evidence (which is why it's such a big deal that Ajit Pai ignored expert opinion in formulating the Net Neutrality-killing FCC order, making the whole order vulnerable to legal challenge).
And of course, open data and evidence-based policy go hand-in-hand: open data gives you the factual basis to evaluate the policies.
"The bipartisan passage of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act is a significant step toward a more efficient, more effective government that uses evidence and data to improve results for the American people," said Michele Jolin, CEO and co-founder of Results for America, in a statement. "We commend Speaker Ryan, Senator Murray and their bipartisan colleagues in both chambers for advancing legislation that will help build evidence about the federally-funded practices, policies and programs that deliver the best outcomes. By ensuring that each federal agency has an evaluation officer, an evaluation policy and evidence-building plans, we can maximize the impact of public investments."
"The OPEN Government Data Act will ensure that the federal government releases valuable data sets, follows best practices in data management, and commits to making data available to the public in a non-proprietary and electronic format," said Daniel Castro, in a statement. "Today's vote marks a major bipartisan victory for open data. This legislation will generate substantial returns for the public and private sectors alike in the years to come."
"The passage of the OPEN Government Data Act is a win for the open data community", said Sarah Joy Hays, Acting Executive Director of the Data Coalition, in a statement. "The Data Coalition has proudly supported this legislation for over three years, along with dozens of other organizations. The bill sets a presumption that all government information should be open data by default: machine-readable and freely-reusable. Ultimately, it will improve the way our government runs and serves its citizens. This would not have been possible without the support of Speaker Paul Ryan (WI-1-R), Senators Patty Murray (WA-D), Brian Schatz (HI-D), Ben Sasse (NE-R), and Rep. Derek Kilmer (WA-6-D). Our Coalition urges the President to promptly sign this open data bill into law."
Congratulations to everyone who has pushed for this outcome for years.
Congress votes to make open government data the default in the United States [Alex/E Pluribus Unum]
(via Naked Capitalism)