Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Reality of "three-parent embryo" news

David Pescovitz at 9:52 am Wed, Feb 6, 2008

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
The mainstream media buzzed yesterday with reports that scientists created a human embryo from three parents, a man and two women. According to the scientific journal Nature's online news site, those experiments at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne have been blown a bit out of proportion. Even still, their success so far does boggle the mind. From Nature News:
The experiments aim to replace genetically damaged structures called mitochondria, found in a woman's egg cells, with healthy mitochondria from unrelated eggs. The experiment has been mooted as a way to help women with diseased mitochondria have healthy babies.

Their work so far has reportedly created ten viable embryos containing genetic material from multiple 'parents'. But these resulted from transplants of DNA between embryos, rather than into a healthy egg as will be needed in future; it is not clear that the procedure will work in normally fertilized eggs.

The team says the progress confirms their hope that nuclear DNA can be taken out of embryos while leaving most, but not all, of the mitochondria behind – a step that will be needed in future for the procedure...

So far, (neurogeneticist Patrick Chinnery) Chinnery said, the Newcastle team has only exchanged the nuclear DNA of embryos that have failed fertility treatments. In other words, it has transplanted nuclear DNA from one failed embryo to another – not from one embryo into a healthy donor egg, as has been widely reported. These failed embryos contain abnormal doses of nuclear DNA...

"There are still a number of scientific issues we've got to resolve, in terms of efficiency, and in terms of whether we can do this in eggs rather than in other embryos," Chinnery said.
Link

David Pescovitz is Boing Boing's co-editor/managing partner. He's also a research director at Institute for the Future. On Instagram, he's @pesco.

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • sonny p fontaine

    I, for one, welcome our new “superhuman” overlords and look forward to doing their bidding.

  • Beryllium

    So in other words, this is essentially the first “hello world” attempt for this project, and the media is just falling over themselves to report on such awesomeness.

  • tomic

    Whew, and just in time! A way to produce humans! We’d almost forgot how! There’s that other method, but no one likes to use it any more, it’s yuky!

  • Sproogle

    I’d rather the media be falling over themselves about this story than about Heath Ledger or Paris Hilton.

  • devophill

    As a fan of The League Of Gentlemen, I reflexively mistrust any doctor named Chinnery. No matter how well intentioned.