Serendipitous searching in the real world

Discuss

5 Responses to “Serendipitous searching in the real world”

  1. ariadneallan says:

    I’m curious if he found more women doing this kind of searching. I also wonder if a culture that has more interest in recycling objects would even out more on the male/female ration of searchers.

  2. kaosmonkey says:

    No longer looking for mushrooms hidden beneath a carpet of pine needles. Mind seeks it’s own game, foraging for nourishment in the forest of information. I hunt novel patterns in an attempt to feed my head.

  3. insert says:

    I feel significantly less guilty about myself when I browse randomly at a bookstore than when I StumbleUpon, but I guess it’s the same thing…

  4. MaliaO says:

    My online searching habits are somewhat similar to my “treasure” hunts. I generally start with a specific task, ie. recently went on my weekly yard sale expedition for vintage fashion accessories, came home with some of those but also with a new desk to replace my old falling apart one, and a gorgeous art print. My best finds are generally “happened” upon and I always leave myself open to changes of direction. I also start out information hunting with a focus but am open to other paths, on recent search for London gangsters, ran across Doug and Dinsdale Piranha, and looked up “litotes.” Got the info I needed, had a good laugh, and educated myself. My sense of elation when I find an absolute treasure is not that different than the satisfaction I get from a successful online search. However when I don’t find any good treasures on my excursions, I’m mildly disappointed but there’s alway next weekend. When I can’t find information I think is out there, the frustration level gets pretty high.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Serendipitous information seeking behavior is not new, but does diverge significantly from most of the fundamental theories. Fundamental theories focus on relevance which is bound tightly to intent (Typically depicted as a pre-cast motive). Serendipitous browsing has little, if any, relationship to relevance (at least as a precondition) to the search initiation. Relevance would only become an issue at the instance of awareness, being the moment in time when discovery, relationship, and applicability merge. Anyone having further interest may wish to explore the Information Science studies by Foster and Ford or by Erdelez.

    Erdelez, S. (1996a), “Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental
    information discovery”, In P.Vakkari, R. Savolainen and B. Dervin (Eds), Information
    seeking in context: proceedings of an international conference on research in information
    needs, seeking, and use in different contexts, Tampere, Finland, Los Angeles, Taylor
    Graham, pp. 412-421.
    Erdelez, S. (1996b), Information encountering on the internet, In M.Williams (Ed.)
    Proceedings of the 17th National Online Meeting, Information Today, Medford (NJ), pp. 101-
    107.
    Erdelez, S. (1999), “Information encountering: it’s more than just bumping into
    information”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp.
    25-29.

Leave a Reply