Danish makers aim to DIY a person into space

Discuss

49 Responses to “Danish makers aim to DIY a person into space”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Why a crash test dummy? I`ll go! ME! ME ME! Let ME go!! PLEEEEAASE?

  2. grimatongueworm says:

    Reminds me of how the Avout got into space in Anathem.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Hmmm… first Dane in space? He’ll have to hurry there’s already one being prepped by the ESA
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Mogensen

  4. Anonymous says:

    Monyafeek, anyone?

  5. Anonymous says:

    Wasn’t this at the end of Gravity’s Rainbow?

    • Gilbert Wham says:

      Never, ever got to the end of Gravity’s Rainbow. Too much guff about bananas.

    • Peter K. says:

      @ Anon #1:

      Wasn’t this at the end of Gravity’s Rainbow?

      From a brief read of the articles it sounds like this project has too much publicity and not nearly enough Nazi bondage gear to really make it comparable.

  6. Anonymous says:

    I’m all in favor of private spaceflight, but that looks like suicide to me.

    Among other things, it doesn’t look like it could possibly provide enough insulation to protect a Dane-o-naut from the temperature extremes of space.

    I’ll catch the Space X bus, thanks.

    • Anonymous says:

      It’s actually called rocket science for reason, not “lets make arguments from thin air”. First, it’s a suborbital flight which will take only a few minutes. You don’t need any heating for such a small time. Secondly, there’s no real difference (in temperature) between flying at 20-30km and at >100km. Actually, since the pressure is lower at 100km, temperature should fall even slower during those few minutes. Thirdly, they ciykd even have a small heater which you wouldn’t see in those photo.

      The point is, you don’t know even the basics, so don’t use the lack of information as an argument. Sure, this project is dangerous, but for completely different reasons.

  7. Ghede says:

    … So tempted to troll and say “They named it after that guy who writes penny arcade?”

    You have no idea how much restraint it takes to not edit this down to just that quoted section.

  8. Anonymous says:

    This is why I don’t care about NASA cuts… we’re going OURSELVES! For that matter – replicating the feats of the Apollo program today (due to the fact that the technology that was pioneered back then can – literally – be bought for a few dollars, and is far more powerful now than it was back in the 1960′s) is comparatively easy. The expensive part today is the large infrastructure used to handle the rocket parts, and manage the fuel; and that should only cost several millions of dollars to put together (the fact that aerospace companies and NASA do spend billions on stuff doesn’t mean that it has to cost billions – it’s the $1000-toilet-seat-effect at work). For that matter, I’ve personally been on construction sites that were more complex, more expensive, and physically larger than that required for a moon rocket… and nobody considers them out-of-the-ordanary.

    • sabik says:

      replicating the feats of the Apollo program today … is comparatively easy

      It would be nice if that were true, but unfortunately it’s not.

      You cannot change the laws of physics. The Rocket Equation tells us that with current rocket engines, sub-orbital lobs (like this) are moderately easy while orbit and beyond (like Apollo) is very very hard.

      No relevant new rocket engines have been developed in the last half a century, and at least one design has been shelved (Orion drive). Ion drives are new, but they’re not suitable for getting to orbit or even the moon — though they’d make a Mars mission much easier.

      So, to replicate the feats of Apollo, you’d also have to engineer around the near-impossible physics, like Apollo. You might be able to improve slightly on it with new materials and so on, but not by much. You might or might not be able to do it any cheaper.

      Or, of course, you go for a suborbital lob and pretend it’s the same.

      • Boba Fett Diop says:

        I’m sorry, but now I have to do this:

        Ye cannae change the laws of physics
        Laws of physics
        Laws of physics
        Ye cannae change the laws of physics
        Laws of physics, Jim

  9. DarthVain says:

    “Only 20% chance of survival…”

    Fine, make six of them. I mean it’s only Danes…

  10. snakedart says:

    I can’t help, when I read “Danish makers”, but picture some misguided pastry chefs with delusions of aeronautical grandeur.

  11. james4765 says:

    I can’t believe anyone would have problems with this – it’s exactly the kind of crazy-brave stunt that, say, discovered the way across the Atlantic. And the Pacific. And drove the Lewis and Clark expedition across America.

    I would so volunteer to work with this crew, if I lived in Europe. I have friends working at NASA, and heard how wrapped up in bureaucracy, political ideology, and waste the Ares / Orion project was wrapped up in. A gonzo engineering project to put a man in space sounds #$%^ awesome, and like something out of a Heinlein novel.

  12. Tweeker says:

    Oh boy! Space goons.

    • SA_12_String says:

      Be afraid. Be very afraid.

      To be serious, I’ve been watching these guys for a long time. They built a fully functional submarine for their last little project and now they’ve stepped it up just a bit in their bid for private manned space flight with donations and some pocket change. Pretty damned impressive, even for a bunch of goons. Many goons tend toward intelligent, but damn!

  13. Anonymous says:

    That thing looks really small. I hope the poo can get out.

  14. Anonymous says:

    The nose cone of the Tycho should be copper, gold and silver not glass.

  15. Daedalus says:

    Relevant Futurama Quote:

    “This is a cool way to die!”

  16. Brainspore says:

    They should follow the lead set by other spacefaring nations and send up an animal first.

    I recommend a Great Dane.

  17. Anonymous says:

    4Gs while standing up? ISTM that being passed out would take all the joy of five minutes of being weightless in a coffin.

  18. SpaceGhost says:

    If your gonna send me into space I’d like a little more room than a coffin sized tube. I’m sure the view would be great but you went all the way into space don’t you wanna be able to wiggle around in the zero G’s a little bit? It’s like driving all the way to Disney World and then staying in your car the whole time with your seat belt on.

  19. jeffbell says:

    Can somebody tell me…. Why a submarine? Why not just a boat?

    Or is that how we are all supposed to know that it is obviously a joke.

    • Anonymous says:

      Because Peter had a submarine and they had to pay for a tugboat…. ;)

    • DefMech says:

      This, as well as the submarine, are absolutely real and serious. The sub was first(there were actually a handful, each a larger design than the last). The rocket is just the next step in a “can we do this?” progression.

  20. Halloween Jack says:

    There are a lot of things that the goons at Something Awful are good at, but rocket science ain’t necessarily one of them. If safety were no object, then the US could have sent someone up a decade ahead of the Russkies–as with climbing Mount Everest, it doesn’t count if you don’t make it back down.

  21. bshock says:

    I don’t know if this is on the level or not, but I would certainly applaud anyone with the bravery to ride in this thing.

    However, aside from my raging claustrophobia, my big concern about this vehicle is that the presumably upright occupant might black out during high acceleration.

    • Michael Smith says:

      #12,

      “I would certainly applaud anyone with the bravery to ride in this thing.”

      Yes, they are braver than I thought.

  22. jonasbn says:

    Hello,

    There is a spelling error in the article. “Cophenhagen” is spelled “Copenhagen”.

    jonasbn, from Copenhagen

  23. Diamond Jim says:

    Anon #6 FTW–I was stumped for a proper Tycho reference–with special mention to the Gravity’s Rainbow love in #1 and #7.

  24. Matt Staggs says:

    Well if that isn’t the fanciest coffin I’ve ever seen…

  25. djn says:

    Keep in mind that they’re launching a dummy this time – they’ll presumably notice the more obvious forms of passenger killing potential.

  26. Jack says:

    Looks like the Acme Corporation and Wile E. Coyote finally found the venture capital funding of their dreams. A sure sign of an economic turnaround folks! And a delight for children, adults and psychotic OCD coyotes who are on the hunt for that seemingly uncatchable Road Runner. Three cheers for our new golden age.

    Seriously, this idea seems like some case study waiting to happen. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark!

  27. Anonymous says:

    Ven der rockets go up, who cares vere dey come down? Dat’s not my department, says Werner von Braun

  28. GraemeM says:

    Shh, don’t tell the health and safety crew (I’ve a feeling I’ve said this before, more than once!)

    Also, Can I have a go.

  29. Anonymous says:

    #12: They aim to keep the G’s below 4 to avoid that same problem. Building a rocket wide enough to lie down in, increases the costs and need for fuel drastically.

    More pictures from their photographer (or someone very close to the group) here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hobonerd/

    And a couple I shot here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/53678031@N00/sets/72157624788217732

    PS: CAPTCHA read ocraday Poèmes??? WTF?

  30. Meta Bee says:

    I don’t know. They are using a dummy for the test run at least.

  31. jeremydelgado says:

    danish makers eh? those are some adventurous pastry chefs.

  32. Robert says:

    Ballistic rocket with a person inside! I think mankind could do technological things more elegant and safer than this.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ScAHXN_kAY

  33. Joakim Ditlev says:

    Come on guys. Why hater these inventors? If guys like these – that you can place anywhere on between mad and genious – we would never see any giant technological leaps.
    How many got killed when tried building an airplane +100 years ago? Some people like to play bowling, others like to build their own submarine or space shuttle…
    I am so looking forward to see if my fellow countrymen will make it next week.

  34. Alex_M says:

    Actually I don’t think the submarine was really built for this project. It was the same guy’s earlier project before this one.

    Check it out:
    http://www.uc3nautilus.dk/

    It’s quite an amazing piece of work!

  35. pKp says:

    Okay, being fired at high speed in space while confined in a metallic coffin ?

    I think I’ve found my nightmare for the next week. Thanks a lot, BB.

Leave a Reply