Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential: How Teenage Girls Made a Nation Cool, by Brian Ashcraft and Shoko Ueda, looks at how this archetype has become such a distinctive international symbol.

"The book is divided in to chapters that cover the impact of schoolgirls on everything from fashion to fine art and from movies to manga," writes Ashcraft. "It features interviews with AKB48, the most popular girl group in Japan at the moment, Chiaki Kuriyama, who played Gogo in Kill Bill, Morning Musume, famed editor and photographer Yasumasa Yonehara, illustrator Noizi Ito, Yasuomi Umetsu of Kite fame, artist Makoto Aida, photographer Tomoko Sawada and manga artist Miwa Ueda, among many, many more. It touches on things like kogal culture, the rise of gal magazines, 1970s schoolgirl exploitation flicks and, yes, Sailor Moon."

Following is an excerpt from the book, about the artwork of Makoto Aida. — Rob

From Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential
by Brian Ashcraft and Shoko Ueda

Makoto Aida was one of Japan's enfant terribles, along with Murakami and Yoshitomo Nara, that took the international art scene by storm in the 1990s. These artists had grown up after the war, while the process of rebuilding Japan was in full swing. They experienced the rapid ascent of the Japanese economy during the heady 1980s, and came of age surrounded by pop culture. They drew inspiration from this--using the language of manga and anime to convey their message.

Aida is iconoclastic and uncompromising, his work varied and provocative. His themes include sexuality, war, and national identity. And he strives the make the viewer uncomfortable: Whether it be videoing himself masturbating in front of a large banner that reads "beautiful little girl," dressing up as Osama bin Laden for a Saturday Night Live-esque video project, or painting the firebombing of New York by Japanese airplanes.

Girls, however, are a reoccurring motif. "At the age of fourteen, I became obsessed with the magical quality young girls have," he says. "As I get older, the age difference gets wider, and yet the almost magnetic attraction to these girls gets stronger and stronger." But, the artist emphasizes, it's not a romantic interest. Rather, it is a reminder of his youth and his aging. "A major reason why it's not romantic is how desperately impossible it is," he says.

During the late nineties, as gal culture was running rampant, Aida became intrigued. "I think those kogals in the 1990s were originals," he says. "Historically and even globally, they were unique, and I sought a way to portray them." Inspiration came from a group of high school girls squatting on the ground in Shibuya. "The scene reminded me of besieged warriors who have decided to commit mass suicide." Out of this, Aida created Harakiri School Girls, originally as a poster to advertise his first solo exhibit in 1999, and later as a painting for the Singapore Biennale 2006.

Laced with dark humor, the work shows a group of uniform-clad schoolgirls plunging samurai swords into their stomachs, disemboweling themselves, and slicing off their own heads. The flash of a blade creates a rainbow in the blood spurting from a girl's neck. A stream of blood flows past a curious kitten, karaoke flyers, and discarded tissues, into a drain. The work is gruesomely cute. "Harakiri School Girls is an allegory for the distorted mentality of Japanese youth at the time and the atmosphere of Japanese society," Aida explains. "After the Bubble Economy collapsed, I felt that an air of pessimism was spreading through Japan like a virus." Everything might have looked cute and happy, but underneath that veneer seethed dejection and darkness. During the nineties, the number of suicides increased year by year, and according to Aida, Japanese patriotism withered away. These schoolgirls, in their loose socks and school uniforms, symbolize the entire country, killing itself.


"Azemichi" or "A Path Between Rice Fields".

In Harakiri School Girls Aida did not want to simply fetishize uniform-wearing girls or create a modern version of traditional bijinga (pictures of beautiful women). Instead he created an homage to the brutal works of ukiyo-e artist Yoshitoshi (1839-1892) and the painter Ekin (1812-1876), both known for their ghastly and grotesque work showing decapitations, stabbings and dramatic scenes of death. "In order to escape the eroticism of the nude, or more explicitly the genitals," says Aida, "I depicted blood and internal organs." And girls in school uniforms. Killing themselves. Smiling.

Aida, who has also included schoolgirls in his paintings Azemichi and Picture of Waterfall, believes the uniform fundamentally suits the Japanese. Not because they provide conformity, but because they provide a sense of belonging to a group--something that is extremely important in Japanese society. The concept of being "in" or "out" is so culturally ingrained that when parents want to punish small children, they will threaten to lock them outside the houses, thereby making them outside the family group. Uniforms, however, offer a sense of being part of something. Yet, over the past two hundred years, Japan has become Westernized by cultures that value individuality. "The foundation for Japanese people isn't Western individualism, and our Asian-style group thinking lingers," says Aida. This creates a paradox, and as the artist says, in Japan today "everything is really warped."

"There isn't a great display of originality in Japan" says Aida. "By copying too much from the West, we've slipped into being importers of ideas. And if you always worry about making a mistake, you'll wither away." However, he continues, Japanese people do show originality in low and pop culture. "In the past, for example, there was ukiyo-e, while now there is manga and anime. Traditionally, Japan didn't think about exporting its own original sub-culture, but kept it inside the country, where it could grow and evolve. Kogals are a perfect example of that phenomena" Kogals are a Japanese original.

 

Amazon link: Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential: How Teenage Girls Made a Nation Cool

Images courtesy of Mizuma Art Gallery
Brian Ashcraft is a senior contributing editor at Kotaku.com

  • SpigotHead

    Let me apologize for my earlier posts, I should have been more clear. I did not mean to pass judgement on anyone, except perhaps the artists involved.

    The original post was a reaction to the title of the book, how the art style “Made a Nation Cool”. For some reason, the facile use of the word cool really ticked me off. That is the reason I kept the “fixed” title exactly the same except the word “Cool”, because I wanted to make a direct comment on it. In retrospect, a bad idea.

    I don’t find this type of artwork cool at all. It’s been done to death, like many other pop culture trends. Perhaps it was culturally relevant once, but it’s been reproduced, distorted and regurgitated so many times it has lost all meaning. And frankly, I do find the imagery infantile and exploitive.

    But I shouldn’t have suggested anything about the artists personally. I do not know them, and have no right to pass any personal judgement on them. I certainly have done things, and will continue to do things, that other people would call perverse.

    And finally, I want to make perfectly clear that I did not mean to insult the Japanese people or their culture. I only wanted to keep the title nearly the same, but obviously “Look Like” was not sufficient in trying to distance the word “Nation” from the suggestion.

    • The Mudshark

      I don’t find this type of artwork cool at all. It’s been done to death, like many other pop culture trends. Perhaps it was culturally relevant once, but it’s been reproduced, distorted and regurgitated so many times it has lost all meaning.

      Since this artwork has been done in 1999, when, according to you, would be the cutoff for cultural relevance?

      Also, I find it pretty cool anyway. But then again I´m one of those philistines who enjoy irrelevant pop culture on a regular basis.

  • Anonymous

    Your replies to spigot head were far more entertaining than the article Daedalus-
    I raise my half full glass..

  • knodi

    “I’m obsessed with little girls. But it’s not pedophilia, because I’d never be able to bang one.”

  • SpigotHead

    There was a problem with the title of your book…

    Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential: How Teenage Girls Made a Nation Look Like a Bunch of Blood-Thirsty, Panty-Sniffing Pedophiles

    There, I fixed it for you…

    • Daedalus

      Hahaha, I hear ya! Nothing like judging an entire culture based on limited pop culture exposure, eh bro?

      Makes the world a much simpler place when all Australians are Crocodile Dundee, all Swedish women are Tiger Wood’s ex-wife, all Americans are closeted, boorish, overcompensating homosexuals, all Brits are inbred fops, and all French people are really snobby mimes.

      Who needs context and understanding when you’ve got the magical power of Otherizing, amirite, dude?

      Anyway, it’s usually fascinating to watch artists challenge archetypes. Gonna hafta check out that book, I think.

      • SpigotHead

        Perhaps you missed the “Look Like” part. I know that there are many Japanese people who find this type of thing as distasteful as I do.

        My real issue is the use of the word “Cool” in describing this. There is nothing cool about this whatsoever.

        But you’re right in a way, my post was not as exacting as I meant it to be. I did not intend to insult the Japanese people, or teenage schoolgirls for that matter. None of this is their fault, so I will try again:

        Japanese Schoolgirl Confidential: How Artists Obsessed with Teenage Girls Made a Nation Look Like a Bunch of Blood-Thirsty, Panty-Sniffing Pedophiles

        Satisfied?

        • Daedalus

          I prefer

          BoingBoing Comments Confidential: How Happy Mutants Justify Their Opinions By Crying Perversion.

          I mean, it just seems like you missed the whole article. The artist profiled here employs the kogal archetype for commentary on things like sexual desire, nationalism, and violence, and it seems you just decided to broad-brush the whole book with the dismissive “pervert nation”/”pervert artist” label. Clearly, it isn’t so simple, but you remain dedicated to the crusade.

          And if you want to satisfy me, you’ll have to talk sexier.

    • Mushimatosis

      you don’t get it, Eroticism works differently in Japan, there is a space between the “erotic idea” and actually wanting to (bang/rape/have tentacles shaped like penises) and actually wanting to do it. It’s fiction, it’s entertaining.

      you’re judging a cultural phenomenon by your US Standards, since Japan’s history and language and cultural process is so different from yours, they understand things differently even from a graphic point of view, they don’t read the same way, they focus on different things and they can separate fantasy from action.

      One of the things I always found cool about Japanese is the definition of space, in western culture a space is something to be filled, in Japanese culture space is whatever remains, what’s between two words, between thinking something is cool, or entertaining and wanting to do it.

  • Anonymous

    People have a tendency to forget that no one fetishizes a culture so much as said culture’s native people. Culture itself is nothing but the sum of various stages of fetishization, but because it appears whole when we come upon it, we assume it’s always been that way, and in its name condemn the very process that created it. This broken system brings us to the conclusion that looking at women because they’re disemboweling themselves is more mature and enlightened than looking at them because they’re pretty. This is subversive, right? This means I GET IT, and I’m better than all those people who are so stupid they’re actually enjoying themselves? Right? Someone? Anyone?

  • Flying_Monkey

    Well, I did a quick straw poll of my wife and her friends (all 30-something educated Japanese women), and they all agreed he was a pervert who tried to have his cake and eat it by at once ‘commenting on’ the a particular minority Japanese male obsession with the sexuality of schoolgirls and also promoting it.

    Having done a lot of research in Japan, including work in the red-light districts of Tokyo, I have to say that anyone here knew much about the extent of unreported rape, sexual harassment, assault, underage prostitution etc. etc. in major Japanese cities, and actually talked to some real Japanese women about what they think about all this, they might be a little less simplistically celebratory of the man’s ‘artistic achievement’.

    • The Mudshark

      So if my wife and her friends appreciated the artwork, would that make it even? Also, who said one can´t be an artist and a pervert at the same time?

  • MrsBug

    I have to ask, how does one manage to decapitate oneself? I can’t see how it’d work by just holding the sword to your neck and pulling.

  • Tokumei

    For anyone still reading this in December…

    SpigotHead’s instincts are right, though perhaps they are not expressed as eloquently as Mudshark’s entertaining observations, and they are certainly a subjective judgement. Flying_Monkey points out the reason why SpigotHead’s general reading of the situation was in the right direction.

    In answer to Mudshark’s closing question, I would say that our society will have become mature when we can, or are allowed to, clearly identify, not judge mind you, just identify, the ratio of creative inspiration versus the degree of outpouring of repression or pain present in a given act or product of self expression. To be fascinated, even entertained, by the outpouring of a disturbed mind is perhaps natural. To coat it with a facade of respectability would be to do the person a disservice, and no less an act of judgement then to declare the artist evil.

    To repress or suppress the artist or the expression itself would of course be hypocritical at best, as few in the modern world do not carry darkness within them in some form. Just to be clear, judgement and censorship is not being suggested here.

    Judgement and awareness are not the same thing. One can identify an obvious fact without it being a measurement of worth against some kind of moral, or other, scale.

    Mushimatosis correctly points out the important Japanese conception of space. Unfortunately, the suggestion that this space exists as a clear delineation between fantasy and deed is perhaps a bit idealistic. Increasingly, for many an overworked male in Japanese culture, the only barrier between act and deed is, variably, financial resources, free time, preemptive virtual consummation via countless forms of media, near constant observation by family or an employer, or any number of other factors.

    Graphical expression can be a healthy way to channel frustration, provided one does not dwell too long on the product for fear of instigating a positive feedback loop. Whether said product has value beyond that is entirely the subjective decision of the observer. Incidentally, the best professional Japanese artist I know personally went through a “dark phase” in which a great outpouring of highly disturbing work was produced, but this is not currently displayed anywhere publicly, only privately to those who may understand the process behind it.

    When an act or product of expression is made with the express intent to disturb the observer, one would do well not to misunderstand the motives or motivations behind the expression. Causing emotional disturbance in another person can be helpful in destabilizing a self destructive emotional state that needs to change, in which case the motivation might be compassion. However, in most other cases, and specifically when the observer is unknown, such as the general public, this represents not only a judgement of the potential observer(s) by the artist (perhaps that will seem obvious to most), but also an expression of the amount of disturbance present in said artist.

    Pain wishes to spread itself, simple as that. When we can openly discuss that in polite society, and not subsequently censor ourselves, imprison ourselves, etc., but also not *celebrate* it, then most of the crap you and I have to deal with every day will pretty much take care of itself and we can then all focus our energies on, say, exploring the universe or something.

    Wouldn’t that be awesome?

    Any discomfort caused by reading this comment is likely self judgement, so don’t be so hard on yourself OK? :D

  • turn_self_off

    I would caution against using the label pedophile on someone that fall in love with his own age group when 14, or for that matter maintaining that when getting older.

    Lets not forget, humans become fertile during that time frame. And the natural thing would be to try and procreate early and often. He is not referring to some prepubescent child, but a, from a biological standpoint, young woman. Tho the signal may become blurred thanks to the “childish” school uniforms of japan (tho the girls in question usually perform modifications to make the appearance more sexually appealing).

  • Rich Keller

    The art reminds me of similar themes from anime like Eden of the East and Ghost in the Shell Stand Alone Complex of alienation and loss of identity.

    …And that second painting of the path through the rice field has a really menacing quality to it.

  • benher

    Makoto Aida is an incredible artist and illustrator – the collection whose cover is featured in the article is a great visual introduction to his work.

    Also, for the Internet record, I prefer the triple striped sailor collars to the inferior double striped versions. Moeeee!!!