Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Nope, we haven't found life on another planet

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 6:34 pm Wed, Dec 1, 2010

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
aliennope.jpg

So, a couple of days ago, when NASA sent out a press release announcing "an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life", I went scrounging around for the embargoed details and managed to look everywhere except the one place that had the information. Having now seen what's actually being announced tomorrow, I have some good news and bad news.

Bad news first: Kottke's speculations are wrong, and this announcement has nothing to do with newly discovered life—or signs of life—on another planet.

The good news: What is being announced is still pretty interesting, if you're into astrobiology and weird life on Earth.

I'm going to go ahead and hold the embargo. I'll post something here about NASA's real news tomorrow afternoon. But I did want to clear up exaggerations that I helped spread the other day, and make sure you guys had a better picture of what was actually going on. Sometimes, I get overly excited and bite into bait I ought to leave alone. My apologies on that.

Also: Not everybody is holding the embargo. A simple Google search will turn up the news of tomorrow, today, if you want it. Frustrated by the concept of embargoes, in general? Join the club. I highly recommend the Embargo Watch blog for some in-depth discussions of what purpose embargoes serve, why journalists follow them, and how the system needs to change.

Some rights reserved by MJTR (´ï½¥Ï‰ï½¥)

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  Science

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • cratermoon

    This article In Chemistry World from August 2008 confirms this is old news: http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/August/15080802.asp

    Unless there are truly new findings that haven’t been picked up on by the non-scientific mainstream press.

  • zax

    That has to be one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen, and adds to my joy at reading boingboing on a constant basis. For a writer to apologise for being overly excitable and biting at bait better left alone makes this place seem all the more human and brilliant. Thank you for helping to make this one of best places to hang out on the internet. Oh and I would say happily continue to bite at bait if when you are misled your apologies are as soulful and well written.

    :)

  • Anonymous

    Well I’m (like everyone) will be interested in what gets shown tomorrow.

    I can’t see that they’ll release info regarding Arsenic-Metabolizing Bacteria in an Extreme Environment; As they already posted that 3 years ago :
    http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/highlights/arsenic.html

  • facetedjewel

    A pink-skinned cousin of the Asgard?

  • benbos

    I was too much of a pessimist to really get that excited about the NASA announcement, but thanks for the links for Embargo Watch.

  • musicman

    Maggie, there’s nothing wrong with passionate excitement, bring it on. Apologising and clarifying after the event makes it all worth while (presuming what you are passionately excited about doesn’t cause ppl harm).

  • johnnyb

    NASA: Never A Straight Answer!

  • Anonymous

    “I know something I won’t tell I won’t tell I know something I won’t tell nyah nyah nyah-nyah” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKvhVssO348

  • Jardine

    Poor Thor. Looks like he’s got a nasty skin condition.

  • W. James Au

    It’s really NASA’s fault for wording the original press release the way they did, it inevitably caused geek propellers to spin at hypersonic speeds. If they wanted to keep things chill they should have been way more muted and said nothing about “the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life”. Of course if they did that, no one would have given a shit about the press conference.

  • murray

    http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/02dec_monolake/

  • Anonymous

    Under promise, over deliver.

  • Anonymous

    Have we at least found death on another plant?

  • Jack

    It would be funny if all of the TSA screening and diddling is really some clandestine preparations for an alien take-over.

  • Anonymous

    For those of you that don’t want to go digging, here is what is going down tomorrow:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1334628/Astrobiology-findings-Alien-bacteria-lives-arsenic-Californian-lake-opens-search-life-planets.html

  • deckard68

    NASA is like the boy who cried wolf when it comes to announcements about alien life.

    I guess this is a little bit better than their usual alternating announcements of “water on the moon!” and “no water on the moon!”.

  • Noobles

    @12 yeah that’s what I feared.

    Like WTF they announced this 3 years ago!

  • Chris Tucker

    There’s actually a transcript!

    “The stars have come right. God help us all!”

  • Jonathan Badger

    Come on! Announcing Mono Lake *again*? I mean, I’m a microbial ecologist myself, so I like the media to acknowledge that the field exists, but really — that was published in 2008.

  • planettom

    I’m holding out for the announcement with video footage that the space station has been taken over by that naked space vampire from LIFEFORCE.

  • Jesse M.

    The finding may actually be more exciting than the dailymail article suggests…rather than just a new type of bacteria that survives in extreme conditions, this gizmodo article suggests its basic biochemistry is fundamentally different from all other types of life:

    At their conference today, NASA scientist Felisa Wolfe Simon will announce that they have found a bacteria whose DNA is completely alien to what we know today. Instead of using phosphorus, the bacteria uses arsenic. All life on Earth is made of six components: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur. Every being, from the smallest amoeba to the largest whale, share the same life stream. Our DNA blocks are all the same.

    But not this one. This one is completely different. Discovered in the poisonous Mono Lake, California, this bacteria is made of arsenic, something that was thought to be completely impossible. While she and other scientists theorized that this could be possible, this is the first discovery.

  • Halloween Jack

    Just because NASA hasn’t found life on other planets doesn’t mean that we haven’t found you.

  • Anonymous

    This is not so much surprised news .life exist another planet possible.
    Cosmic world eye found some life planet .may be one day it will be possible
    To finding a alien life.
    Thanking