Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Boing Boing on Jeopardy!

David Pescovitz at 8:17 pm Mon, Feb 6, 2012

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

Boing Boing was a clue on Jeopardy! tonight. "Who was Steve Jobs?"

David Pescovitz is Boing Boing's co-editor/managing partner. He's also a research director at Institute for the Future. On Instagram, he's @pesco.

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • http://twitter.com/winkytwit Neil Winkelmann

    Congrats on this endorsement of-a-sort. 

    I’ve never understood the whole Jeopardy backwards answer-then-question thing though. Take any of the so-called questions and ask them…”Who was Steve Jobs?”. The natural answer is not the statement “Tech blog Boing Boing….” etc. Why do they do it? What is wrong with simply asking questions?

    • SoItBegins

      Wikipedia sez:

      “According to Merv Griffin, the idea for Jeopardy! began when he and his wife Julann were on a plane trip:

      ‘I was mulling over game show ideas, when she noted that there had not been a successful “question and answer” game on the air since the quiz show scandals. Why not do a switch, and give the answers to the contestant and let them come up with the question? She fired a couple of answers to me: “5,280″ – and the question of course was “How many feet in a mile?”. Another was “79 Wistful Vista”; that was Fibber and Mollie McGee’s address. I loved the idea, went straight to NBC with the idea, and they bought it without even looking at a pilot show.’”

      • http://twitter.com/winkytwit Neil Winkelmann

        I see that it can work for some situations where the answers are very distinctive and point to a single question; but it really doesn’t work for most QA setups.

        • Ambiguity

           

          but it really doesn’t work for most QA setups.

          ???

          Well, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, as they say. Seeing how Jeopardy! has been on the air since 1964, I’d say it works pretty well!

    • mtdna

      This obnoxious imaginary creature lives under a bridge.

      • taras

        Who is mtdna?

  • Antinous / Moderator

    We’re a tech blog?

    • http://borborygmist.influxofdust.com/ Wayne Dyer

      Neurozine would be a clue just for the old-timers.

    • http://twitter.com/winkytwit Neil Winkelmann

      Good point. Boing Boing is a bit “techie” but is much more than that, too. My favourite spot on the interwebs.

      • David Pescovitz

        Wow, thanks! And Wayne, not just neurozine but “World’s Greatest Neurozine!,” according to the t-shirt. Thanks for sticking with us.

    • penguinchris

       Of course we find that moniker strange, but then I’m not sure what widely-understood descriptor they could have used instead – and just “blog” is too non-descriptive.

      “Neurozine” is a great description, but to use something like that in a Jeopardy clue would be a bit much. As it is the entire Boing Boing reference in the clue is irrelevant – if you don’t get the answer just from “late Apple visionary” you shouldn’t be on Jeopardy :)

      • dagfooyo

        I suppose “Directory of Wonderful Things” would have been too verbose.

    • Jake0748

       That was going to be my question as well.

    • Cowicide

      We’re a tech blog?

      Can you sue Jeopardy for defamation of character or something?

      • Antinous / Moderator

        Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus.

    • http://noctilucent-studios.blogspot.com/ Noctilucent Studios

      Came in here to say exactly this. who knew?

  • http://orbitnet.com JIMWICh

    TREBEK!

  • CpnCodpiece

    On a somewhat related note, why is the site suddenly hideous?

    • Antinous / Moderator

      You must have the ‘naughty’ cookie.

      • CpnCodpiece

        Oh yes, I see that notscripts was blocking typekit.com, sorry – delete if you wish.

        • http://repeaterband.com skeletoncityrepeater

          Hey, this is totally unrelated, but I love your nickname. My best buddy and I have affectionately called Mick Mars of Motley Crue ‘Cap’n Codpiece’ for years.

  • http://twitter.com/digitalArtform Joseph Francis

    Don’t get too excited; they could have said, “This late Apple visionary was a late Apple visionary,” and it would have elicited the same response.

    :D

    • allium

      The “Tautologies” category is strictly reserved for Celebrity Jeopardy.

  • David Miller

    While this is awesome, it makes me wonder… Who sits around filming Jeopardy on their television sets?

    • David Pescovitz

      Well, my sister on the East Coast texted me when she saw it, so I grabbed a phonecam video of that little bit for quick uploading to YouTube. I’m sure there’s a better way to do it but, as you can probably see, I don’t have a particularly state-of-the-art television rig.

  • http://repeaterband.com skeletoncityrepeater

    Congratulations on the mainstream shout-out, Boing Boing! My favorite website despite the steady increase in popularity!

    • lesbianjesus

      At least you can say you were here before it was cool ! Right ?

      • http://repeaterband.com skeletoncityrepeater

         It’s still not cool. Not at all.

  • http://www.mrericsir.com MrEricSir

    That seems like a ridiculously easy question for Jeopardy, and by that I mean that even I know the answer.

    • dagfooyo

      It must’ve been for $100.  A shame, there are so many awesomely neat facts and bits of trivia surrounding BoingBoing they could’ve made the contestants guess.

      • allium

         $400 in a College Jeopardy tournament – so yeah, $100.

  • dagfooyo

    Damn, I misread the headline as “BoingBoing IN Jeopardy” and got all freaked out for a moment.  ”BoingBoing ON Jeopardy” is way more awesome and less scary.

  • Bob Knetzger

    I had also read that switching the format to showing the ‘answer’ saved lots of room on the  orignally hand lettered cards, making the type larger and more readable on the set. No wasting precious space on the cards with pointlessly repetitive  words like: “Who was…?” “When was…?” “Where was…” etc.

  • Bangorian

    What struck me was that if Trebeck had said the phrase “Tech blog Boing Boing” in the 1980′ (which is the last time I tuned in for an episode of Jeopardy), nobody would have had any idea, or even concept, of what he was talking about.

  • Christhegirl

    Wasn’t this a repeat? I think I’ve seen this before, and I haven’t been watching Jeopardy lately. Even if it’s irrelevant in the end, it’s a nice shout-out. 

    • millie fink

      Proly not, since that Apple visionary didn’t die all that long ago.

  • jackbird

     It makes me wonder when/what the first appearance of the word ‘blog’ in a Jeapordy question was.

    • http://twitter.com/lucyrickyalex Chris Schumacher

      The Double Jeopardy round of the October 1, 2004 episode had a category called “Blogs”.

      http://www.j-archive.com/showgame.php?game_id=20 

      Please note that I am not related to any contestants in this episode. I think.

  • David Weintraub

    The point of a good Jeopardy “Answer” is to give an obscure fact (Tech Blog Boing Boing), but then give a good general clue (Look like a old Mac to commemorate this person). In the end, the whole “Tech Blog Boing Boing” part of the clue really doesn’t matter. You think “Who is important enough in mass culture to be commemorated by making a site look like an old Mac screen?” The answer is, of course Steve Jobs.

    This makes the “answer” look harder than it actually is. The answer/question format is just part of that whole “brainiac show” style that has made Jeopardy so popular. People love watching these geniuses slug it out with each other.

    In reality, the questions are not that difficult. I can answer about 70% to 80% of the questions fairly quickly, and I’m no Jeopardy material since I do terrible with names and title categories. Any fairly knowledgable, intelligent person will know most of the answers.

    Jeopardy really comes down to buzzer speed. You have to be the first to press the buzzer, but you can’t press it before the host finishes asking the question. Otherwise, you’re out of the running for answering that question. You read the question and figure out the answer before the host finishes reading the question. Then, you have to anticipate the end of the question for the race to the buzzer. Press too quickly, and you’re out. Press it too late, and you’ve lost the buzzer race.

    An excellent book on Jeopardy is “Prisoner of Trebekistan” by Bob Harris, a five time champion.

  • obeyken

    Boing Boing, you’ve been Jeopardied