— FEATURED —
The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: The Truth Behind the Nixonian Presidency of Obama
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Compton, Lonzo Williams and the Wreckin' Cru
Real Stuff: Bad Trip
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Photos: Throughout Latin America, protests demand justice for Guatemala after genocide trial overturned
Guatemala: protests condemn annulment of Rios Montt trial, while ex-president Portillo extradited to US
NYT Editorial Board: "Justice Interrupted in Guatemala"
— RECENTLY —
Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation
We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
Odd Duck: great picture book about eccentricity and ducks
Scatter, Adapt, and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction
Illustrator William Stout's Legends of the Blues - exclusive excerpt
Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor
Review: Disunion, the VR guillotine simulator
Mousetronaut: kids' picture book about mouse in space, written by a Shuttle pilot
Review: Pebble e-paper watch
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Rob Beschizza at 9:50 am Tue, May 22, 2012
OK, I’ll bite: I don’t see the irony. And I also don’t see how to be sarcastic about it. (And yes, I’m German.)
BitTorrent, developers of the BitTorrent protocol (which is used by millions of people to do …. you …. know …. what) sues a company for infringing their intellectual property.
Not the best irony, but an irony none-the-less.
A trademark dispute of this sort isn’t so much an “intellectual property” situation as it is a “fraud” situation. They don’t own the words bittorrent, but you aren’t allowed to use the words in your company name to pretend you are that /other/ bittorrent.
What people don’t realize is that this is the one and only purpose of trademark law: to prevent one company from fraudulently pretending to be another and selling their products or services under that pretense.
Unfortunately, it gets lumped into the term “intellectual property” alongside copyright and patent law, which exist for completely different purposes (to create an economic incentive for the creation and publication of creative works and inventions, respectively). With that term comes a public perception that all three exist because whoever comes up with an idea has a natural right to control all uses of it. And that’s why the public conversation on these topics is such a mess.
OK, thanks. That’s what I thought. I had hopes that there was some delicious tidbit that I’d missed, but apparently there wasn’t. :-/
Isn’t BitTorrent a textbook example of a genericized trademark?
I don’t know anyone who uses ‘BitTorrent’ as a verb. The verb is ‘to torrent’
Rorschach test separating lovers of situational irony from sarcastic morons.
Can’t I be both?
That would make you quite a troll!
Well, if you’re gonna do something, do it right. ;D