Why science needs silly-sounding research


7 Responses to “Why science needs silly-sounding research”

  1. crenquis says:

    Hmmm, so by correlation I can infer that my wife must smell more like stinky cheese than I do…  Valuable research indeed.

  2. Cowicide says:

    Ironically, some of the most ardent naysayers of silly-sounding research could possibly benefit quite a bit from it.


    With more research, maybe one day conservatives/libertarians can get treatment for their conditions.

    • Steve Nordquist says:

      Spoiler: Amygdala size scans, with opaque identifier matrices, possibly only good for Sex and Death- related psychology issues. Your Uni. is already on the phone asking how much you want to donate to the Punk (or Postpunk) metrics wrt. your study focus.

  3. SHaGGGz says:

    It is the height of arrogance and simpleminded lack of imagination to suggest that any line of scientific inquiry is without value. Much of the high tech magic we enjoy today was brought about by insights gained from distantly related fields, anything from quantum mechanics to insect mating habits, that have taken decades to find application. 

    • crenquis says:

       Exactly.  If the study is well designed and gets reproducible results, and reveals a little factoid that we did not know, then it is good science and helps increase the resolution of our picture of the universe.

      • Jason Doege says:

        I hardly think that every factoid merits equal investment, though. Do you? And, if not, how do you determine how much to invest in the various studies? It is not likely, as SHaGGz suggests, that people think they are completely without value, it is that they think the value is so low as to not merit investment relative to other inquiries (or activities.)

  4. pjcamp says:

    I’d like to research what the world would look like if you could ride on a wave of light.

    My name is Albert Einstein and that’s how the theory of relativity started.

Leave a Reply