Rob Beschizza at 1:35 pm Sun, Apr 4, 2010
— FEATURED —
Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel
Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Real Stuff: Bad Trip
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: Super-Fun-Pak Comix, featuring Caveman Robot, and MORE!
Brain Rot: The Statue
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala awaits Constitutional Court rulings, defense continues legal challenges to genocide trial
Victoria Sanford: "It’s Too Soon to Declare Victory in Guatemalan Genocide"
— RECENTLY —
We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
Odd Duck: great picture book about eccentricity and ducks
Scatter, Adapt, and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction
Illustrator William Stout's Legends of the Blues - exclusive excerpt
Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor
Review: Disunion, the VR guillotine simulator
Mousetronaut: kids' picture book about mouse in space, written by a Shuttle pilot
Review: Pebble e-paper watch
Nothing Can Possibly Go Wrong: YA graphic novel about robots, romance and school elections
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
⟿ Follow Rob Beschizza on Twitter.
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
So it IS true: iPads, iPhones, iPods and the like are for iDiots only.
I imagine a guidebook that referred to Scunthorpe in Lincolnshire (England) would have problems.
Ip*d: cleansing device which does a hell of a stevejob.
The worst problem I see is not that Mac is too prudish to say “sperm”, but that their censorship program is so badly made that it cannot allow for “sperm whale” as a single term. Is it really that hard to program a naughty-word detector that conceals “sperm” but allows “sperm whale”, which is hardly an obscure animal? It’s just stupid.
How do you know it’s not filtering “per”?
The strangest censoring I’ve seen is on one of my apps… Piggies is a guinea pig soundboard, but in Canada, it only has “g****a pig” sounds.
Check it out: http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/5164/screenshoton20090702at9.png
Obviously not an Australian nanny, given that in the line above it says that the novel is rooted.
It m**t be r****y h**d to g*t o*e’s p***t a****s w**n t*e m**t of o*e’s m*****e is s*****d o*t.
Well, at least Mocha Dick made it through the filter.
Mocha Dick was the sequel, published when Melville tried cashing in on the blaxploitation craze of the 1870s.
ZOMFG, this is ridiculous to the extreme! I’m from Germany, this kind of censorship alone would keep me from getting an iPad. What is this, North Korea?
Slowly…… Slowly….. Apple is returning to the 1984 commercial but this time as Big Brother.
This book is rooted in two true stories..
Note that the word “root” in Australia is coarse slang for sexual intercourse.
Good work! Constant vigilance is our only defense against corporate nannyism.
Every sperm is sacred.
Every sperm is great.
If a sperm is wasted,
God gets quite irate.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
As wholly incomprehensible as the commercial itself is (one senses that it’s at least a twenty-first century know-nothing snub of Melville, whose name is by now largely unrecognized), I’ll settle for the one bright spot: that there are still Python fans out there…
I’m surprised they didn’t filter out “Dick.”
Is this censorship just in the store blurb, or is it also in the book itself? I’m guessing it’s just in the blurb from the lack of outrage, but you don’t say.
Maybe it let “dick” through because it’s a common name. Hell, our last vice president was a dick. That is, his name was Dick. ;-)
Orwell would be proud.
“Come; let us squeeze hands all round; nay, let us all squeeze ourselves into each other; let us squeeze ourselves universally into the very milk and sperm of kindness. Would that I could keep squeezing that sperm for ever!” — Moby-Dick, Chapter 94, “A Squeeze of the Hand”, I swear I am not making this up.
Just the blurb, I’m sure. This sort of thing is about not offending customers rather than moralizing. The fact that this is such a vague and meaningless target is why the outcomes are often so ridiculous.
Mocha Dick made it through but something tells me that Black Dick would not be so lucky!
I downloaded a surf music tune to my Sprint PCS phone. Now I can listen to Miserlou by D**k Dale any time I want!
I’ve got quite a few episodes of the D*** van D*** show on mine.
Perhaps it is just the blurb, but that does not make it any less appalling. The word sperm, regardless of context, is not something that needs censor; even by the strictest of standards. The fact it is used in a non-sexual way just makes it even that much more ludicrous. Regardless, sexual or not, it cannot be considered profane. Welcome to the Ministry of Truth.
I masturbate every time I read the word ‘sperm’, so it obviously is pervert fodder to let such a word slip through. Now excuse me, I have to go wank off to that ocean of filth called ‘the old testament’.
“The man” is very stupid.
Essentially when an “offensive” word or phrase is bleeped from a larger text, the censor is encouraging the audience to actively take part in filling in the blank.
Aristotle and his contemporaries called this an enthememe. Well… actually an enthememe had to be a logical proof where one of the premises or the conclusion was missing. The statesman would pose two (or more) elements of a proof that the audience agreed with and then let the audience provide the final piece themselves. Because the audience had part ownership in the missing element they were more emotionally invested in the idea.
So by all means, governing bodies and corporate conglomerates, bleep away! ‘Cause “we don’t need no water let the m***er f***er burn! Burn, m***er f***er! Burn!”
“Because the audience had part ownership in the missing element they were more emotionally invested in the idea.”
What does this say about the bb practice of disemvoweling?
I cancelled my Flickr Pro account because in Germany you are now not
allowed to view nudity (which is legal), but Nazi symbols (which aren’t).
The question is, who did the censoring? Is the seller responsible for writing the blurb and if so, did Project Gutenberg self-censor? Or does Apple apply a “naughty word” filter on all blurbs? Any other uses of “sperm” in other blurbs censored out?
Nevermind, I just searched on “sperm” in the App Store, and got results for S***m Killer, iCount (S***m), and oddly, iSperm. A filter, but apparently not entirely effective. Stupid.
I loathe Apple and have since their restrictive development policies twenty years ago. Ego and artifice combined with pretentiousness.
Google-”Do no Evil”
Apple -”Evil Away me boys!”
Just be grateful the story wasn’t set in “Scunthorpe”.
This article is misleading.
The iPad has tons of parental controls that can be turned on and set at different levels. This is no different than cable TV controls.I don’t have the controls set on my iPad since I am mostly grown-up. I downloaded this same book and have sperm spelled out all over the place while viewing it in iBook.
Apple can go gargle a nice cupful of s***m. What a load of s**t.
“Winnie the Shit”
It’s the iPrude!
In other news, the phrase “filthy, filthy jizz” is on Apple marketing materials.
Let’s see. Is it sexual discrimination if they don’t filter e*g, too?
I’m still trying to figure out “Mocha” Dick. Yet another example of a spell-check gone horribly wrong?
Not at all; he’s getting rich. Evil? Absolutely, but stupid? How come he’s so rich if he’s so stupid?
Rich people can’t be stupid? Seriously?
“The man” is not all the rich. Some The Man owns a corporation and she is the rich. But some The Man is a teacher. Other The Man pushes the pencil around for the government. Other The Man is the voice of millions of church people. Then put them all together and they are still The Man.
The Man is very stupid.
Look at how they left the word “Essex” untouched! Our children might be permanently traumatized if they remove the first two letters of that word! Imagine your young, impressionable child (who is for some reason reading Moby D***) accidentally putting his or her finger over the first two letters of “Essex” and turning into a deranged s*x maniac!
“Mocha Dick, or the Venti White Half-caf Whale.” Starbuck is a character in the novel, so this must be a clever corporate tie-in.
This makes the iPad worthless in terms of being a text book reader. There is sperm all over biology text books.
I hope they censor e*g.
Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the iPad shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill! Apple has spoken.
Apple have been doing this for years. Here’s a screen capture I took in April 2009:
I’m sure it’s not Apple being prudish as much as Apple being afraid of prudes calling for boycotts. They probably figure they’d lose more customers without the filter than with it.
Translate: it’s more bottom line dollar than big brother.
Big Brother is all about the bottom line.
heheh – you said ‘bottom’. heheh.
Don’t be so negative. This is really an opportunity in disguise for people to make up all kinds of innuendo out of clean words. Think of the fun to be had!
Did Ahab’s limb come with him to Essex on the Pequod?
They should censor “pad.”
Ugh, so we can return to the era when kids learned “weener” and “thingy” and other googoo gaga euphemisms instead of legit terms.
Moby Thingy, the Weener Whale?