Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

275-foot tower in Ohio blasted for demolition falls in wrong direction

Mark Frauenfelder at 8:04 am Thu, Nov 11, 2010

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

At first I thought the people in the video were being overcautious when they started to run away. The tower seemed too far away to hurt them. But keep watching.

275-foot tower in Ohio blasted for demolition falls in wrong direction

Mark Frauenfelder is the founder of Boing Boing and the editor-in-chief of MAKE and Cool Tools. Twitter: @frauenfelder. Come and hear Mark speak at the ALA conference in Chicago on July 1.

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • EH

    So where’s the story on how, exactly, they determined that it was an “undetected crack?” “This looks like it was from an undetected crack. I can tell from some of the pebbles and from seeing quite a few undetected cracks in my time.”

    • Brainspore

      In this case the “undetected crack” was what the guy who planned the demolition had been smoking at the time.

  • turn_self_off

    yeiks.

  • technogeek

    Not the first explosive demolition to go wrong, of course. Some folks underestimate the complexity of the task and misdesign the pattern of charges, and sometimes the stress and reinforcement just aren’t where they were expected.

    Good job spotting that the wires were at risk when it *did* go wrong, and getting folks clear. That could have been nasty.

  • Lea A Franco

    Once you’ve watched the vid, go to the link and look at the still photos. It looks like there’s not much around the tower in the vid, the stills tell a different story.

    I’d have run like hell,too.

  • Anonymous

    Luckily no one was hurt. It must have been hard explaining to the 8000 people why they lost power that day.

  • PaulR

    The file should be called ….stackfail…

  • dogcow

    They brought their kids along to see the ‘splosion?

  • planettom

    Looks like the smokestack is (was) here in Google Earth:
    39 55.448 N 83 51.024 W

    • RadioSilence

      and they were standing here: 39 55.47 N 83 50.86 W
      you can see the green tanks, and the shadows of the pylons just east.

      god bless google maps :D

  • PeaceNerd

    I’m glad the camera man hung in long enough to pan left at the last second.

    Also: that little girl shows way better instincts than the grown ups around her.

  • Narmitaj

    See Britain’s “Last Victorian”, Fred Dibnah, bring down a massive brick chimney the old-fashioned way, with fire, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L1WOnR2KBY . The collapse itself is at 7:25 – with him standing about 15 feet from the bottom (impossible with explosions) – followed by a horde of kids running up to congratulate him.

    His way was appropriate as it allowed the chimney a last hurrah, belching smoke as part of its own demise. He took away bricks from the bottom of one side of the chimney, propping it up with wooden supports; when it was time to bring the thing down he would light a bonfire and burn away the supports… so the direction-finding was pretty accurate.

    Discovered by TV as a steeplejack fixing Bolton Town Hall in a local news item, Fred Dibnah became a national telly presenter on subjects like steam engines, the Industrial Revolution and the construction of cathedrals.

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for that, Narmitaj. So glad to have found out about him now.

  • treeskier

    unbelievable. all you naive, gullible boingers….can’t anyone see this is a blatant hoax? where are the inch-by-inch forensic breakdowns of the video pointing out the camera tricks and cgi overlays? where are the wild motives and conspiracy theories about the intent of the video producers? very disappointed.

    c’mon people – an 8 yr old in a hard hat blowing up a 275 ft smokestack? really?? take the bait!!

  • JPMacD

    Yeesh. And it’s made a LOT scarier by the fact that children were there too!

  • misadventures213

    That was all kinds of awesome.

  • Anonymous

    props to the camera guy. talk about balls of steel with electrified power lines whipping around…

  • Subdrill

    I’m not a professional pixel-detector, but I have a couple guesses based on some demolition and explosives experience. The cause was almost definitely not “an undetected crack” but poor blast design. A popular method of taking down large smokestacks directionally like this is the wedge method; imagine a lumberjack cutting out a large wedge from a tree, then following up with a smaller wedge opposite the larger, causing the trunk to weaken and then fall toward the large opening. This can work if done correctly, but requires a good understanding of the materials and their residual strength.
    The second part of the 2-part blast you see was meant to cut the support and use it as a pivot point for the whole stack to fall toward the wedge, but too little was left after the wedge cut (you can see the entire stack “sit down” 5-10 feet rather than tip). Of course now that the wedge is crushed out, you have a compromised tower than can fall in any direction, or even stay standing indefinitely.
    This is basic demolition blast design, and Advanced Explosive Demolition should be very embarrassed, no wonder “The Imploders” was canceled. Check out “The Detonators” on the Discovery Channel, episode 4 shows how a chimney blast is really done.

  • LeFunk

    Love the meticulous countdown. Gives the impression that everything was oh so thoroughly planned and thought through.

    • fataltourist

      You’re right. I’m sure they did this on a whim.

  • Dewi Morgan

    You can get chopped in half by a flailing low-voltage cable just as well as a high-voltage one, so they needed to GTFO, but it seemed like they were unnecessarily concerned about the cables after they fell.

    To me, they look like telegraph poles with no insulation, rather than insulated power pylons. Though ring voltage can be as dangerous as mains, and the wire’s unlikely to be insulated, it’s not HT, so not going to be going to be a serious danger unless you grab the wire, is it?

    • eaglescout1984

      Looks like “Street Voltage” (The voltage at which electricity is stepped down to for the lines that run on power poles or under the street.) This is usually at 12,4500 or 13,700 volts (hence the dramatic blue flashes as the tower hits them). Now it’s likely they are dead by being tripped out, but if they are still hot they can easily kill you. Same reason cops are always telling you never to get near downed power lines after a storm.

  • Mason Gentry

    Cooks Source stikes again!

  • fricative

    Springfield, Springfield, it’s a hell of a town!

  • eee

    from DDN:
    “The explosives detonated correctly, but an undetected crack on south side of the tower pulled it backward, said Lisa Kelly, president/owner of Advanced Explosives Demolition Inc.”

    Apparently they travel around the country with their children, blowing stuff up.

    • Anonymous

      Apparently they travel around the country with their children, blowing stuff up.

      Wow. Greatest/worst parents EVER.

    • eee

      Sorry about replying to myself….meant to post link to video from different angle.

  • Anonymous

    Love Ohio….