Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Irony Vigilante Bill Keller: NYT copyright infringement was "illustrative uploading"

Rob Beschizza at 12:25 am Sat, Feb 11, 2012

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

Book Review

We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir

Science

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

Bill Keller, former executive editor of The New York Times, rails against those who mock him. The newspaper published someone else's column without permission while he was busy insisting that copyright infringement is theft, and has been subjected to much ridicule as a result.

The law should not go after minor transgressions. Moreover, I specifically said a real reform should also relax some copyright protections – such as cases where a work that is long out of print could be made widely available to a new audience. Nowhere did I suggest that the law should criminalize the illustrative uploading of a 36-year-old alt-weekly article that is otherwise unavailable.

Well said, Bill Keller!

The interesting thing about Keller's new op-ed role is that, like the Times' "public editor", it appears to be an unmoderated sinecure by design, occupied by a fellow whose lack of self-awareness may be disconcerting to some colleagues.

Previously: NYT publishes "infringement is theft" column and rips off another paper's article in the same weekend

⟿ Follow Rob Beschizza on Twitter.

MORE:  navelgazing

More at Boing Boing

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor

  • Jake0748

    Irony vigilante is vigilant. 

    • http://mordicai.livejournal.com Mordicai

      Irony vigilante is ironic!

  • Warren_Terra

    The sneering “alt-weekly” really is a nice touch: that sort of publication is obviously undeserving of consideration, let alone of rights. I’ll bet that the New York Times quite zealously protects its rights regarding articles it published 36 years ago. If I were to, for example, rip off their  coverage of Jimmy Carter’s inauguration and post it in whole on a site with traffic like theirs, I’ll bet I’d hear from them soon enough.

    And is it even otherwise unavailable? Is it, for example, available (for a fee) through Lexis/Nexis from your own home, or by visiting the Boston Public Library? Because if the former – and Nexis is older than the article, although I don’t know if it included the publication in question – what’s the difference compared to  the New York Times‘s online archives, which are also available for a price?

  • Robotech_Master

    A really funny thing is that, though Keller claims they took the article down when the Phoenix complained, they actually didn’t. They removed the links to it from the NY Times articles, but if you type in the URL illustrated in the screen capture in the Phoenix editorial, you’ll find the actual PDF is still there on the server. (At least at the time I’m writing this. If others have noticed, it may be gone by tomorrow.)

  • goldenearth

    There’s a lack of ethics in all of this, but there’s no lack of irony!

  • http://imcravingpresidency.tumblr.com/ SedanChair

    That’s great, a backhanded comment about alt-weeklies. You’re great, Bill Keller.

  • Aleknevicus

    The message from Big Media is remarkably consistent:

    “Copyright infringement is bad… except when we do it.”

  • http://codeflow.org/ Florian Bösch

    “illustrative uploader”, ah, hard to keep up with media slang for “pirate” sometimes. C’mon everyone, give Bill Keller a hearty arrrrrrrr!

  • Douglas Rushkoff

    One of us! One of us! 

  • t3kna2007

    “[...] I’d be tempted to propose a law keeping irony out of the hands of the clueless.”

    Fortunately for you, Mr. Keller, there is no such law.  Nor is there a law against starting an argument with a rhetorical thrust that you disavow even as you’re making it, nor against wrapping yourself in the flag of free speech while supporting a policy that suppresses it, or you’d be in trouble over those too.

    We get that you have contempt for our beliefs.  That’s why it’s a fight.

    Your position in leadership of a media giant disqualifies you from commenting objectively.

  • Halloween Jack

     Keller really does come off as kind of a tool. You have to read his column on why Hillary Clinton should replace Biden as Obama’s running mate to grasp the full depth of his delusions.

  • Paul Renault

    Is this the same Bill Keller who is stabbing Julian Assange and Wikileaks in the back, after using material that WL gave them?

    (Read the The Rolling Stone interview.)

  • http://profiles.google.com/leavemymonkeyalone Joe Simmons

    If Keller decides to offer downloads of the original unaltered Star Wars trilogy (younger than 36 year old series that is otherwise unavailable) I’ll forgive him.

  • Ito Kagehisa

    The law should not go after minor transgressions.

    Wow.  Don’t have good laws, have lax enforcement!  That’ll never be abused!

  • http://feldmanfile.blogspot.com Len Feldman

    There’s a word for this: Hypocrite.