Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

What YouTube, Twitter, Pinterest would have looked like in the '80s and '90s

Mark Frauenfelder at 8:51 am Thu, May 10, 2012

— FEATURED —

Book Review

Lexicon: smart, sharp technothriller from Max "Jennifer Government" Barry

Book Review

The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle


[Video Link] Squirrel Monkey makes very funny and almost believable "what if?" videos that imagine what popular websites might have looked like if they were launched 20 or 25 years ago.

YouTube | Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Pinterest | Draw Something | Google | Angry Birds

(Via Laughing Squid)

Mark Frauenfelder is the founder of Boing Boing and the editor-in-chief of MAKE and Cool Tools. Twitter: @frauenfelder. Come and hear Mark speak at the ALA conference in Chicago on July 1.

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • tw1515tw

    I think Look Around You did it better
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_TgM0pCDvI

    • http://disqus.com/Kimmoth/ Kimmo

      : D

    • retepslluerb

      As long as we drop links:

      24 done in 1994

      http://www.collegehumor.com/video/3052195/24-the-unaired-1994-pilot

  • http://dailygrail.com/ Red Pill Junkie

    My tombstone is getting closer by the minute. Fuuuuuuu…

  • jmzero

    There was a fair number of “sites with funny videos” in the time of Windows For Workgroups – most were MPEG-1 compressed, and very short.  They took a while to download.  Many had no sound.

    But yeah, the alternate reality part here is that nobody would have wanted to host too many videos, or have them become to popular.  It would have been (and still is pretty close to being) way too expensive.

  • bcsizemo

    FLV my eye.
    I was using Indeo Video 3.

  • http://disqus.com/Kimmoth/ Kimmo

    IIRC FLV wasn’t a thing in the 90s; I guess the acronym was too irresistible.

  • mike_silva

    Stupid.  In 1991 when I was a freshman at Berkeley, Apple demoed a beta of Quicktime to the Berkeley Mac Users Group that met on campus.  Microsoft had fired up their photocopiers and shipped AVI not much later in 1992.  Oh and I remember downloading the initial release of the Mozilla browser that year too.  So, um, yah.  No one was FLVing the web for the majority of the 90s.  And yah, while the first half of the decade had slow access speeds, by the middle it was much better…especially if you were on campus or had a J-O-B (something today’s college graduates are probably unfamiliar with…thank you’re parents and grandparents for the Republican economic policy, kiddies).  Nice try though.

    • Balance of Power

      You might be right about downloading a web browser in 1992 but it wasn’t Mozilla, it was likely Mosaic the precursor to Netscape Navigator which wasn’t around until 1994. Though according to Wikipedia, the initial release of Mosaic was not until 1993.

      • mike_silva

        Version 1 of NCSA Mosaic (yes, I typoed like an idiot) may have been officially released in 1993.  But I…and other folks…were using Mosaic before then.  Even in the 90s Internet software was released in beta form.  If you read the full Wikipedia article, you’ll find that development started in ’92, and there were versions before 1.0.

        • Balance of Power

          It’s an understandable mix-up, I just wanted to clarify. Cheers!