Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Great moments in pedantry: Poisonous vs. Venomous

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 5:57 am Tue, May 29, 2012

— FEATURED —

Science

Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling

Book Review

The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

Feature

The Snowden Principle

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

The key difference, writes blogger Jason Bittel, is in the biting. Venomous animals internally create a toxin and then inject it into prey or foes. Poisonous animals usually secrete their toxins on the outside.

So here's a rule of thumb: If you are dying because an animal has bitten you, chances are, it was a venomous animal. If you're dying because you touched an animal or (foolishly) put it in your mouth, that's poisonous.

And then, of course, there's the slow loris:

Because the loris manufactures toxin from specialized glands on its elbows, then transfers that liquid to small, curved teeth for injection, the loris is venomous. Alternately, mother lorises cover their offspring’s fur in the same potion, rendering them poisonous.

Read more about various poisonous and venomous animals at Jason Bittel's blog, Bittel Me This.

Image: Natural History Museum - London, a Creative Commons Attribution (2.0) image from nickstone333's photostream

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  animals • great moments in pedantry • Science

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • arcfinn

     Never heard of a loris before, in fact I  don’t think I’ve heard of any venomous or poisonous mammals before.  

    • Ryan_T_H

      Platypus are venomous

      • Pedantic Douchebag

        Thank you for not using “platypi”.

        • ImmutableMichael

          Although that is the correct term for 3.14 platypus . *rimshot* *silence*

        • Wreckrob8

          Antipodean platypodes?

      • arcfinn

          True, but they are mammals of the oddest sort.

    • Palomino

      I love the internet! Wikipedia has a great definition: Venom = hunting , poison = don’t eat. Venom is intentional, however something may be poison for some, not all, to eat.  But there’s exceptions to that too. 

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venomous_mammals 

      SOME, NOT ALL:

      Venomous
      -Shrew 
      -Mole
      -Platypus

      Venomous/Poisonous
      -Loris
      -Hedgehog 

      Poisonous
      -The most unique, the African Crested Rat, eats poisonous bark then applies the mixture to a part of it’s fur that’s designed to soak up the poison. 

      • Ipo

         Platipus don’t use their poison/venom – toxin for hunting, breaking that rule. 

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Rulon-Miller/1029409265 Bill Rulon-Miller

        Loris are venomous; hedgehogs do not produce their own toxins but take it from toads that they prey on and are thus poisonous.

        Now you know.

    • Antinous / Moderator

      Never heard of a loris before

      You are clearly not spending enough time at I Can Haz Cheezburger or Daily Squee.

    • Jerril

       Shrews are venomous as well.

  • http://twitter.com/snakenuts Alex Crouzen

    Now, if I touched or ate an animal, I am ‘poisoned’, but what if I got bitten, what am I then? ‘Venomised’? Is there an adjective for that?

    • Glen Able

       envenomated

      • Philbert

        Envenomatorized

      • Antinous / Moderator

        You really want to try to get yourself bitten by creatures in whom envenomation is voluntary. Nothing says relief like a dry bite.

        Also, odd that this doesn’t mention stings, which account for many, if not most, envenomations.

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/5OQFBZ26C3VQ5ONGZGDBDY4BUU Mark A

      Fucked.

      • Wreckrob8

        Well fucked, mate!

      • noah django

         agree in spirit, but something tells me if you ran into an ER exclaiming “I’ve been fucked by a slow loris!” you might get sent to the psych ward rather than the poison ward.

  • wibbled_pig

    Boy, I bet that slow loris can drop some *brutal* elbow bombs..

    • http://twitter.com/CanYouGetToThat Dane J

      The Jungle’s own Randy Savage.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=696968610 Cori Frazer-Hopkinson

    I know Wikipedia isn’t always right, but it purports that the reaction to loris “poison” is actually an allergic reaction and the animal doesn’t actually produce poison/venom. Anyone know for sure?

    • http://profiles.google.com/marc.k.mielke Marc Mielke

      I think if the vile crap needs specialized glands its poison or toxin, otherwise (like the Komodo Dragon IFAIK) it’s just vile crap that harms/kills you.

      • Beanolini

        like the Komodo Dragon IFAIK

        Komodo dragons do have venom glands, apparently, though there is some disagreement over how much effect this actually has on their prey.

    • Jerril

      A venom that kills you by directly attacking your tissues and a venom that kills you by getting your own body to attack your tissues are separated only by level of fanciness in the design.

      The reaction to “poison” oak and ivy is also immune-system based, but it’s still a defensive chemical.

      People who are actually allergic to lorises (and that includes most people alergic to cats) suffer from a distance and from airborn particles. Most humans only suffer from contact.

  • http://www.nathanhornby.com/ Nathan Hornby

    Is this pedantry?  Or instead just knowing what words mean?

    • http://www.ikaink.net Itsumishi

      Stop being a pedant!

    • http://twitter.com/incarnedine_v Dan Hibiki

       like poison, it all depends on delivery.

    • http://twitter.com/opticalens Mike Perkowitz

       pedantry is in the eye of the beholder

  • Just_Ok

    Loris ipsum periculosum

    • Robert

      et commentator ridiculosum

  • pizzicato

     It is the poisonous arm pit glands not elbow…

  • theophrastvs

    sometimes Latin ain’t yer friend:

    Sola dosis facit venenum

    translated for time immemorial as:  “The dose makes the poison”
    (“venenum”? “poison”?)

    • Wreckrob8

      There is a term for that ‘false friends’. See, we’re all friends really.

    • GawainLavers

      The beauty of English is that we have taken an enormous array of what would otherwise be synonyms from other languages, then assigned shades of meaning to them to differentiate them, e.g. house (haus) vs. mansion (maison).

      • Ipo

        Totally correct statement, only your example is not an example at all. 

        Maison : from Old French maisun, from Latin mansiō (“ abode, home, dwelling”)
        Mansion : from O.Fr. mansion

        House/Haus/Hus is what Angles, Saxons and Jutes called their abodes even before they moved to those islands.

        • GawainLavers

          That is what I intended my example to mean.
          Maison is French for “abode”.
          Haus is German for “abode”.

          Mansion != house in English.

          • Ipo

            Yeah, I got what you meant to mean. 
            And I liked it. 

            But the word “Mansion” is an example of French appropriating Latin and English also appropriating Latin. 
            House/Haus is an example of a word continuously in use by those that would become the English and those that stayed on the continent. 
            The inhabitants of what is now England, and what was part of the Roman imperial province Britannia, already knew the Latin word before the English peoples arrived.  
            Why are you mentioning French at all? 

            Look up what a mansion is. 
            The Wikipedia article begins with: “A mansion is a very large dwelling house.” 

            Maison != mansion in English.
            Was that your point?
            That the French assigned a different meaning to the Latin word than the English did?

          • GawainLavers

            http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=mansion

            mansionmid-14c., “chief residence of a lord,” from O.Fr. mansion “stay, permanent abode, house, habitation, home; mansion; state, situation” (13c.)

      • dragonfrog

        I quite like the bit in Ivanhoe about how Saxon animals go to France when they die.

        Swine (German Schwein) become pork (French porc)
        Cows and oxen (German Kuh and Ochs) become beef (French boeuf)
        Calves (German Kalb) become veal (French veau)
        Sheep (German Schaff) become mutton (French Mouton)

        • GawainLavers

          Yes!

        • Beanolini

          Saxon animals go to France when they die

          I was taught that during Norman rule in England, French was the language of the nobility, and English the language of the common people- and so French speakers would be unlikely to meet animals except when served as food.

          (I have no idea whether this is actually true, or just one of the many urban legends regurgitated by my school teachers).

          • dragonfrog

            Yeah, that’s the setup there – the people who get to follow the animals around pastures and shovel their poo are English speaking Saxons, the people who get to eat them once they’ve been conveniently roasted are French speaking Normans.

  • Palomino

    And there’s “allergens” and “toxins”. Are they different or the same? I’ve heard “toxic” used a lot, especially in marine life.

    What about “allergic reactions”, those kill too, probably more than poison and venom combined, like asthma. In the United States, 9 people die daily. 

    My point is, “poison” is very subjective, it’s usually in place of “toxic”, and many things can be “toxic”, like relationships. 

    I guess the Loris is the Platypus in the poison/venom debate.

    • Robert

      Don’t forget the mutagens and hallucinogens. And vectors.

      • Palomino

        Are there different classes and sub-classes? I’m not a chemist. 

        I did learn something interesting from a Park Ranger here in Phoenix AZ. Most older venomous snakes DON”T use venom when they strike at things they have no intention of eating, they’re conserving it for food. She said the snake has learned through the years that their strike is enough and venom isn’t needed. It’s the young ones who don’t know better and some die because they don’t have enough venom stored for their next meal. 

        I don’t know why rattle snakes get such a bad rap, what other creature warns you with audible sounds warning unsuspecting wanderers not to step on them. The snake knows you’re too big to eat, they’re just being courteous. Pretty ingenious.

        • http://www.fatjerry.com Dimmer

          So, ask for ID when in a potentially bad situation?

  • http://redesigned.com redesigned

    I don’t know, they look delicious to me!

  • danegeld

    like, duh? Come on BoingBoing, please say that we knew the difference between poisonous and venomous already.

  • noah django

    that loris appears to be  tripping.  its.  ass.  off.

  • http://www.facebook.com/TJOToole Tom O’Toole

    If we’re getting into pedantry, the loris doesn’t manufacture poison at all. There was a great BBC nature documentary on loris population and why so many were dying when released into the wild after being bred or rehabilitated in captivity. The findings were that they actually derive the poison from the things it eats (insects IIRC), which they then concentrate in their glands. They also coat their fur with it to deter predators and parasites.

    Here’s a link to the BBC page for the documentary:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00nflz1