Portland's "Naked American Hero" not guilty!

Discuss

60 Responses to “Portland's "Naked American Hero" not guilty!”

  1. unit_1421 says:

    I love that they built a conveyor tray anti-cock fort around him, that’s priceless!

  2. Sagodjur says:

    “You failed to properly file a request for a permit for your spontaneous protest 14 days in advance of your completely unplanned actions, therefore your  impromptu demonstration is not considered valid.”

  3. Koocheekoo says:

    Our local news has some great photos from the trial including his post-trial victory dance.  
    http://www.kval.com/news/business/Man-who-stripped-for-TSA-search-at-PDX-found-not-guilty-162935416.html 

  4. Slartibartfatsdomino says:

    “A Multnomah County prosecutor said if Brennan’s actions are considered protected by the First Amendment, then anyone who is arrested while nude can also claim that their actions are a protest.”

    Hey, you jackass prosecutor, if they are committing a crime while nude, than you can arrest and prosecute them for that crime. Otherwise, it’s not illegal to be naked in Portland. 

    • social_maladroit says:

      It is, actually, under Title 14 of the City Code:

      It is unlawful for any person to expose his or her genitalia while in a public place or place visible from a public place, if the public place is open or available to persons of the opposite sex.

      14A.40.030 Indecent Exposure

      (Don’t let someone fool you into thinkin’ you can come here ‘n’ show off yer naughty bits without havin’ a chat with the local constabulary!)

      So, uh, the upshot was that the right to free speech granted by article 1, section 8 of Oregon’s Constitution trumped the city code against indecent exposure.

      Which is a pretty damn cool outcome.

      • Slartibartfatsdomino says:

        Oh, I was apparently confused. It’s a good thing I don’t habitually go walking around the block naked.

        Next time I feel the urge, I’ll make sure to make a sign first!

        I’m actually heading out through PDX in a few days. And I’m pretty peeved at the TSA. But I don’t think I’ll be able to bring myself to repeat Mr. Brennan’s statement. 

  5. elix says:

    The revolution will not be clothed.

  6. vrplumber says:

    If you are naked in public, you don’t need a sign or “written message” to draw attention to your issue.   

    That will take care of itself.

  7. bbonyx says:

    Did someone say American Hero?

    ♫ Believe it or not, I’m wearin’ no clothes!
    Never thought I could be so nu-u-ude! ♫

  8. Culturedropout says:

    Congratulations, sir.  My… clothes… are off to you.  Never have so few exposed so much to shame so many.

    But this one just cries out for a caption…

     http://media.kval.com/images/120718+TSA+Protest+Brennan+%283%29.jpg

  9. Cyran0 says:

    Makes me wonder what other states have laws similar to Oregon’s?

  10. Sarah Goebel says:

    john brennan, you’re my hero.

  11. efergus3 says:

    Funny, though I’m surprised that they didn’t make him shave his beard off. Could be hiding a terrorist or two in there. Just saying…

  12. Funny. Last time I flew to the U.S., I opted out of the porno scanner and got the pat down. They gave me the “nitrates” song and dance, too…

    •  Nitrates from fecal matter, they sit around with their thumbs….

    • Jerril says:

       I’m opting out this summer. It will be an interesting and totally unscientific test to see if I get the same “nitrates” comment.

      For Science!

    • Rachael Hoffman-Dachelet says:

      Lotion with glycerin in it registers positive.  I was once told by a nice TSA gentleman to wipe down my CPAP (a medical device) with rubbing alcohol before I fly to remove the glycerine from my lotion to avoid getting a positive on the bomb materials sniffer thing.  

  13. Paul Renault says:

    The prosecutor seems to be painting the picture that Brennan wasn’t legitimately protesting because he didn’t raise any issue during the pat down and wasn’t wearing any sort of written message—like painting his chest with some words of protest—admonishing the TSA.

    Two points:
    1) People wearing t-shirts with anti-TSA messages have been told, not asked, told by the TSA to take them off.
    2) The prosecutor has said, if I understand him correctly, that if the protestor has an anti-TSA message painted directly on his/her chest, the (s)he will accept it as “symbolic” nudity and protected as free speech.

    So PDX users, you have your marching orders!

  14. StumptownGeek says:

    It appears that the TSA officer’s testimony was truncated in the reporting.  It should have read:

    “Were you able to see his genitalia?” asked the prosecuting attorney.

    “Yes,” said Van Gordon.  “I was intimidated by his balls of steel.”

  15. Bodhipaksa says:

    I take my hat off to the man. And my pants.

  16. That_Anonymous_Coward says:

    Makes one wonder if those gloves test positive for nitrates on their own.

    • alexb says:

       What, the purple *nitryl* gloves might have nitrates in them…or something similar?

      • That_Anonymous_Coward says:

        Or it might just be a handy tool to “find” nitrates on people who opt out of the pornoscanners and the TSA agents then have to frisk.  If they make it as inconvenient for you as possible many people will just willingly be subjected to unmetered amounts of radiation to avoid the extra hassle and the joy of missing a flight.

    • Ipo says:

       Makes me wonder which laundry detergent to use before flying. 
      Are there any without nitrates? 

    • James Penrose says:

       I suspect, but have no evidence, that the machines generate a random number of “positives” to keep the “officers” alert (since their job is 99.99999 per cent useless, repetitive and boring) and because there’s just going to be a certain error rate inherent in these instant chemist-in-a-box devices.

      (Note: the fancier x-ray machines can also generate random alerts when scanning carry-ons so a certain percentage will get hand-inspected for the same reason and to test the “inspectors”.)

      When working drug dogs or bomb dogs, they have to be allowed to find something once in a while or they get dispirited and bored and since the average TSA staffer is less bright than the average beagle, you have to work harder to keep them engaged since giving them squeaky toys doesn’t look good to the public.

  17. pjcamp says:

    So that means the silent lunch counter sit-ins of the 50′s were also not protests?

  18. Stonewalker says:

    I like this naked man.  Rock on, civil rights action hero!

  19. The King of Athiests says:

    Awesome.  I hope there are daily mass protests at the Portland airport.

  20. kmoser says:

    His epidermis is showing.

  21. Stefan Jones says:

    COINKYDINK!

    I just finished reading these comments when a story about Brennan ran on the local TV news. He was interviewed outside the courtroom, and came across as an articulate, level-headed, laid-back geek.

    Good’oh man!

  22. awjt says:

    I was just in the EU and Canada this year. Not saying any other country is better than the US, since they all have their problems. But, I can tell these other places are generally a whole lot more laid back than our dear old U S of A. People mind their own damn business more and aren’t trying to control everyone else. Oh, there seems to be way fewer ignoramuses and ruffians in these places, too. Don’t know why.

  23. John Maple says:

    I opted out for the pat-down and told the guy that I was there for my “free government massage”.  He laughed and said he would go easy on me.

    • No says:

       Yes, they’ve been using humor as a way to diffuse the situation now.  Smile while your rights are being stripped from you . . . . fools.

Leave a Reply