Mugshot sites sued


4 Responses to “Mugshot sites sued”

  1. Boundegar says:

    Because even the pretense of privacy is completely obsolete?

  2. SomeGuyNamedMark says:

    “Phil Kaplan, a 34-year-old freelance graphic artist charged in 2011 for failure to disperse from a party a few doors from his Toledo residence, said his mug appeared on and mugshotsonline, which he said charge hundreds to get a photo removed. He refused to pay.”

    Maybe “” would be a better name.

  3. hugh crawford says:

    You don’t need a photo release to use someone’s photo for journalism or art.
    You do need a photo release to use someone’s photo for trade or advertising.This is pretty obviously the latter not the former.

  4. Promethean Sky says:

    The sheer number of sleazy outfits online continues to shock me. This is despite the fact that I already find most of the human race utterly despicable.

Leave a Reply