TOM THE DANCING BUG: Hollingsworth Hound - "The Sequester and YOU"

Tom the Dancing Bug, IN WHICH Hollingsworth Hound explains the Sequester, and YOU!

HOW CAN YOU NOT join the prestigious and exclusive INNER HIVE, and get Tom the Dancing Bug, by @RubenBolling, emailed to you at least a day before publication? Also: more!

YOU MUST join this very instant.

HOW CAN YOU NOT join the prestigious and exclusive INNER HIVE, and get Tom the Dancing Bug, by @RubenBolling, emailed to you at least a day before publication? Also: more!

YOU MUST join this very instant.

Published 9:05 am Wed, May 1, 2013

More at Boing Boing

Paintball Sentry Gun vs Toddlers - no contest

This week in Gadgets, Fark's Drew Curtis joins us to share stories about his awesome non-lethal home weapons arsenal. Brought to you by Pluralsight, the world's largest tech & creative training library

Maker Mayhem: Low Moments in How-To History, Part 8

Burnt Matchstick Easter Decorations: When celebrating the Resurrection means looking no further than your ashtray. By Matt Maranian

21 Responses to “TOM THE DANCING BUG: Hollingsworth Hound - "The Sequester and YOU"”

  1. BreakingDeadMen says:

    It’s a sad day when Lucky Ducky doesn’t win.

    • gukibupytew says:

      my best friend’s step-mother makes $74 every hour on the laptop. She has been out of a job for 10 months but last month her paycheck was $15434 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on  Zap22.c­om

  2. iamlegion says:

    Maybe Lucky was a furloughed air traffic controller who got to keep getting paid when HH made his call?

    CURSE YOU LUCKY DUCK

  3. Ewesuk says:

    Always goes to show politicians don’t give a shit unless it directly affects them. It’s just like the old joke of having all the drug companies CEO’s in the same room and giving them AIDS. Somehow a cure is discovered 10 mins later.

    •  I’d love to get a copy of your joke book.

    • Navin_Johnson says:

      Not just politicians, most “comfortable” Americans don’t give a shit either, and you will often see that illustrated in BB comments. Working poor and struggling are priced out of flying for anything but the most rare occasions, which is why you see such uproar over flight delays, TSA etc.

      • xzzy says:

        “Priced out?” What? You speak like cheap airfare is just a matter of waving a wand and watching the prices drop. 

        There’s a ton of overhead to getting a plane in the air and travelling several hundred miles an hour.. given all the financial problems that existing airlines have, I’d suggest that even current prices are too low. 

        Such travel should remain a luxury, I really don’t want to live in a world where people treat hopping on a plane like going out for ice cream.. there’s enough air pollution out there already.

        • Navin_Johnson says:

           I think we’re actually in agreement….

          • Funk Daddy says:

            Good, then it is three of us now. Air travel is currently under-priced and subsidized and abused.

          • By all means, let us raise the price of air travel to where it’s readily available to only the 1%, or, perhaps being generous, the 5%.

            Damn those serfs, always trying to ape the behaviors of their betters.

          • Funk Daddy says:

            That would be a measure of “Austerity, Bitch” that would be preferable to cutting social services.

            But as you see it went the other way.

        • benher says:

          Fear not! America hath a robust and reliable railway system that shall obliterate commercial air travel in our time!

      • SamSam says:

        The demographics of BoingBoing are going to skew heavily towards those who can browse the web on their work computers while getting paid, unfortunately.

        More deeply, though, it’s very hard for the average person to really pay much attention to too many of anyone else’s problems. Someone’s annoyance at the TSA is nothing compared to the trouble someone below the poverty line has in getting health care for their sick child, but it hard for them to focus on, and empathize with, that and every other trouble for more than the occasional moment.

        At least many people can empathize with the plight of strangers, even if just some of the time. Some (Republican representatives) really only care when it affects them or a family member directly.

    • Daneel says:

      Sounds a bit like the Asimov short story The Winnowing

  4. Jon Bakos says:

    These have basically stopped being comics and started being documentaries.

    • benher says:

       I am having a more and more difficult time laughing. Even Lucky Ducky, it seems, can no longer stand Hollingsworth.

  5. steve heath says:

    I’m really happy for you folks who think airfare is too cheap and that flying is overused and abused. Perhaps you’d like to tell those of us with families in South America or other overseas locations the most energy efficeint way to visit our loved ones. I guess I could walk but I’m a bit old for such a journey. Couldn’t really get there and back in my 2-3 weeks off. Maybe I should just forget the family and consentrate on how wonderful it must feel for people who can afford to see their grandkids.

    • Jonathan Badger says:

      Skype? Nobody’s denying that cheap air travel is a very nice thing from a personal point of view even if it’s a disaster ecologically. But throughout history people who moved even a few hundred miles from home dealt with the fact that other than the occasional letter, they wouldn’t have any contact with those left behind. Now we can live on different continents and still see each other through video conferencing on a daily basis. And yes, servers use energy, but not nearly as much on a per person basis as do planes.

    • Navin_Johnson says:

      It would be nice if flying was cheap, and it would be nicer if trains were more viable. If you’re feeling bad, maybe consider that some things in the sequester are literally making people homeless.

  6. steve heath says:

    Perhaps you have never been along the banks of the Amazon River and don’t know how poverty and lack of infrastructure limit those Skype or even basic email opportunities. And somehow the hug from a 8 year old loses a lot online. Given the state of our immigration policy they have about zero chance of moving or even visiting here.
    I’m aware of the damage done to the environment from a lot of sources. That adds weight to visits there because these guys will either grow up nuturing and respecting their home or cutting it down for a tiny bit of profit to them. It justs irks me to read such a blanket condemnation of travel that serves to connect people. Could the airlines be pressured into using a more efficeint fleet of planes? Pricing travel out of the means of poor folks will still allow the rich to do what they want.  

Leave a Reply