It's easy to find alarming evidence that we've lost our way when it comes to civics in the US. But longtime global activist and MIT prof Ethan Zuckerman says there's a lot to get excited about too, if we're willing to think in new ways about what it even means to be civically engaged in the digital age.
Ethan's working with a group of scholars and practitioners (I'm one of them) to track how young people are expressing voice and exerting agency in public spheres through participatory politics. Registering to vote or campaigning for a candidate are obvious and important political moves. But so is appropriating Occupy for hurricane relief, mobilizing Hunger Games fans to organize for real-life civil rights, or producing a libertarian music video professing a crush on the economist Friedrich Hayek, (thanks Liana Gamber Thompson).
But here's the rub. If we're willing to take this expansive view of civics, how do we start to make sense of what any given activity really achieves in the world? When does "voice" make a difference? That's the question Ethan took on this week in his keynote, How Do We Teach Digital Civics? at the Digital Media and Learning conference in Chicago. He offered this diagram as a way to map actions into one of four quadrants.
Want to figure out where your own civic moves fit in the mix? You can watch Ethan's whole talk here. It's an attempt to envision an approach to civics that engages young people's imaginations and networks rather than telling them what to do.