U.S. gives lamest non-apology ever to wrongly imprisoned former war-on-terror detainee

Reuters.


Reuters.

The U.S. government has apologized to Abdullah al-Kidd, a U.S. citizen who was arrested in 2003 and detained as a material witness in connection with a terrorism-related case. But the way they did it was pretty pathetic.

PDF here.


PDF here.

From Stephen Aftergood at FAS Secrecy News:

Mr. Al-Kidd, represented by American Civil Liberties Union attorney Lee Gelernt, challenged his detention as unconstitutional and inhumane. Now the case has been settled, with an official apology and a payment of $385,000.

"The government acknowledges that your arrest and detention as a witness was a difficult experience for you and regrets any hardship or disruption to your life that may have resulted from your arrest and detention," wrote U.S. Attorney Wendy J. Olson in a January 15 letter.

This sort of admission of regret is rare. The government apologizes much less frequently than it perpetrates injuries that are inappropriate or unwarranted. So, for example, the recent Senate report on post-9/11 CIA interrogation practices noted that at least 26 individuals had been "wrongfully detained." But legal attempts to recover damages are typically foreclosed by courts based on "separation of powers, national security, and the risk of interfering with military decisions."

Why not apologize and compensate those who have been abused and mistreated, starting with those individuals who by all accounts are innocent of any wrongdoing? It would be the just and honorable thing to do, both for the intelligence community and for the country.

US to Detainee: The Government "Regrets Any Hardship" [FAS]