Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Hidden art in Woody Woodpecker

David Pescovitz at 9:16 am Tue, Apr 12, 2011

— FEATURED —

Science

Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling

Book Review

The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

Feature

The Snowden Principle

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

[video link]

Did animation pioneer Shamus Culhane secretly slip his own abstract paintings into 1940s Woody Woodpecker cartoons? Apparently so, according to cartoon historian Tom Klein writing in the new issue of Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
 Images 2011 04 11 Arts 11Woodpecker-Span 11Woodpecker-Span-Articlelarge
From the New York Times:

“Culhane essentially ‘hid’ his artful excursions in plain sight, letting them rush past too rapidly for the notice of most of his audience,” Mr. Klein writes in the 15-page article, titled “Woody Abstracted: Film Experiments in the Cartoons of Shamus Culhane.”

In the article Mr. Klein describes Mr. Culhane, who was credited in his work then as James Culhane, as a devotee of the avant-garde. He was influenced by the writings of Russian theorists like Sergei Eisenstein and Vsevolod Pudovkin, Mr. Klein writes, and spent evenings at the American Contemporary Gallery in Hollywood. There, he watched films by Fritz Lang and Jean Renoir, might have seen paintings by Oskar Fischinger and definitely “was inclined to wear a beret.”

Mr. Klein writes that one of (Culhane's) experiments was a two-second piece of an explosion in “Woody Dines Out,” from 1945. He finds the frames “improvised like visual music” in what Mr. Culhane acknowledged in his autobiography, “Talking Animals and Other People,” was an Eisenstein-inspired moment.

The longest such experimental sequence was in the seven-second steamroller smash-up in “The Loose Nut,” also from 1945. And, later in that cartoon, Woody is blown into an abstract configuration that Mr. Klein, in his article, calls “the convergence of animation and Soviet montage.”

"That Noisy Woodpecker Had an Animated Secret" (Thanks, Bob Pescovitz!)

David Pescovitz is Boing Boing's co-editor/managing partner. He's also a research director at Institute for the Future. On Instagram, he's @pesco.

MORE:  Art and Design

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • Zoll

    The woody cartoon is meh… I’m mesmerized by the Universal logo at the beginning, how did they make it?? Neeed…. to… stop repeating it… but can’t…

  • blatantdisregard

    I’ve always been fascinated with the in-between art lost in the action of cartoons. During explosions or when a character is mashed or stretched, taken as a single piece of work some of the cels are really incredible.

  • sievetronix

    I don’t know much about the Avant-Garde but I know this, That Woodpecker is a dick.

  • bolivar13

    If you’re looking for the painting(s?) check out 4:41.

    • Anonymous

      THANK you.

    • Charles Scalfani

      And at 6:31

  • Sweet Zombie Jesus

    I object to the implication in the article that cartoons are not genuine art.

  • DimensionalPunk

    Wow, I’m ashamed to have been a fan of Woody when I was little. I’m glad he didn’t rub off on me at such a young age. Woody’s negative influence must have been overshadowed by characters like Optimus Prime.

    • Pantograph

      For me realizing that Woody was a dick was a seminal moment in growing up. Discovering that the Tom and Jerry cartoons by Chuck Jones weren’t merely weird but far better than the rest was another.

  • nehpetsE

    Woody woodpecker… Christ what an asshole! i alway hated him.

    • holtt

      Clearly anti-maker.

      That concrete guy is an artist, and our “hero” keeps messing up his work.

  • nehpetsE

    btw, non-art based continuity error @5:38 The construction guy’s stubble disappears for one whole scene. Did they think we wouldn’t notice?

    • nixiebunny

      The guy in the continuity error at 5:38 looks like he was drawn by a different artist. He in the background in that scene, instead of being a character as he is in the rest of the film.

      There are layers in animation, and when you shift a guy from one layer to another, it’s like sending him through a portal to another dimension.

  • Anonymous

    I have to agree with nehpetsE… even as a child Woody W. struck me a s a complete douchebag, not in an anarchic, cool way a la Bugs Bunny, but in a dickish way. He was inconsiderate, self-absorbed, violent… and no subsequent notionsI have formed of the Id really excuses him, in my eyes.

  • gwailo_joe

    Smoothing concrete properly is hard. It’s an art to do it well.

    Woody Woodpecker. . .he ruins everything he touches.

    And his pecks to the head look like they would really hurt.

    crazy unmedicated bird. . .

  • Nawel

    I always loved Woody. I didn’t remember this particular cartoon, but thanks for posting the story.