Stop ACTA: secretive treaty will bring in the worst of SOPA through trade obligations

Discuss

17 Responses to “Stop ACTA: secretive treaty will bring in the worst of SOPA through trade obligations”

  1. Olga van Saane says:

    Cory, I just watched this video, from October 2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S3vttwMUoQ&feature=related where the guy says that we are too late and ACTA has been signed and it’s only a matter of time when it’s fully operational. I also noticed the banned by some countries videos, etc, since last year more and more of that.  What you say?

    • Loris Cuoghi says:

      Yes, it has been signed, today.
      And now we have till June to fight it back, before it is finally accepted by the EU Parliament.

      La Quadrature du Net is doing a great work on this, clarifying every step of the process, and what each of us can do to fight this unjust, unlawful and oppressive thing. We all have to do something, no one else can do this for us.

      ACTA signed by the EU, le’ts defeat it together

      http://www.laquadrature.net/en/acta-signed-by-the-eu-lets-defeat-it-together

      How to act against ACTA

      https://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/How_to_act_against_ACTA

      The Web site “Stop ACTA!” too is a work of La Quadrature.

      ACTA procedure in EU Parliament

      * The International Trade (INTA) Committee of the European Parliament is the main committee working on ACTA.
      * The Legal Affairs (JURI), Development (DEVE), Civil Liberties (LIBE) and the Industry (ITRE) committees will first vote on their opinions after holding “exchange of views” on draft reports in the coming weeks.
      * Opinions will then be sent to INTA to influence its final report, which will recommend the EU Parliament as a whole to reject or accept ACTA.
      * The final, plenary vote by the EU Parliament on ACTA should be held no sooner than June.

      PS: Earlier, I saw the first comment, about ACTA being adopted by EU countries, at first emptied, then deleted. I replied to that, then my comment got deleted too. I hope it was deleted by the author, and not by someone else.

      • Olga van Saane says:

        Sure, Loris, I know all these sites (it’s not possible not to know them if you are into anti-ACTA  ;)  but it’s all right to repeat, probably there are some people who still wonder what’s it all about)  and I’ve  been there, done all I could, as an individual.  Can’t do more than that. Btw, have you seen how many (how few, better say!) signatures are on website STOP ACTA? Handful of a few thousand.  It’s nothing, I am afraid. 

  2. I always knew Mickey Mouse was evil!

  3. kamil antosiewicz says:

    Tens of thousands protesters joined forces yesterday in Poland in the largest street protests against ACTA in Europe. In vein… 
    http://www.thenews.pl/1/12/Artykul/84286,Poland-signs-ACTA-agreement-%E2%80%93-LIVE

  4. ialreadyexist says:

    We have to pass it first so we can know what’s in it.

  5. Andrew Singleton says:

    Wait. It was signed?

    Is it in effect?
    >.>
    <.<
    I'm not European. Whaddoido?

    • Loris Cuoghi says:

      It’s *global*. It is being pushed for agreement on every country as a requirement for international trading.

      • Andrew Singleton says:

        Signed the white house petition and the congresscritters ’round here are… less than encouraging. Not sure what else I can do.

  6. flipa says:

    From techdirt, “What Is ACTA And Why Is It A Problem?”:
    http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120124/11270917527/what-is-acta-why-is-it-problem.shtml

    Basically, a lot of the criticism towards ACTA is dated. The preparations WERE surrounded by a ridiculous amount of secrecy but the text has now been out in the open for quite a while. The treaty DID try to introduce a high level of liability to ISPs, but that part was later struck out. We have Knowledge Ecology International http://keionline.org/ to thank for turning the awful original ACTA into this current, more tolerable version.

    Right now, it looks like ACTA won’t require changes to laws in EU member states or on the union level. However, it does seem to cement copyright legislation to its current state, making it very difficult to undo mistakes that have already been written into law.

    • flipa says:

      Ok, I’m coming back to amend my earlier comment. FFII thinks that ACTA is not compatible with existing EU legislation, TRIPS or UN treaties: http://acta.ffii.org/?p=1082

      “ACTA will negatively impact innovation, competition, development, fair trade, start up companies, mass digitization projects, access to medicines and Internet governance.”

      Anyways, folks, before you raise panic about ACTA, do try learn about the recent changes. I’ve seen a lot of Americans posting about the treaty today, and a lot of their information is copied and pasted from sources that date back to 2010. Back then there was a solid reason to complain about the secrecy surrounding the negotiations. Those complaints are a bit outdated now. It’s time to focus on the content.

      • oblivion328 says:

        Yeah, I was worried about ACTA two years ago, and only now do many other people seem to even know the damn thing exists. And it’s weird that even some news sources seem to be reporting outdated information about the treaty including the ISP liability thing.

  7. Kathryn says:

    So what is actually in the treaty now? Will ISPs still be forced to spy on us and report us? What about the three strikes?  

  8. Obywatel RP says:

    Protests against ACTA in Poland http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPiV_SB-scM

  9. rockguitardude says:

    Lesson for 2012:
    Any 4 letter law or treaty is evil.

Leave a Reply