Rob Beschizza at 5:20 am Mon, Jul 2, 2012
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
Hat tip to Rebecca Rosen.
As the legal copyright holder of the doll known as “Troll” I must insist…
Makes more sense in the context of the full patent.
It’s a lure. I wish there really were troll lures.
I like “FIG. 6″.
I think there are troll lures, someone has certainly gone to a lot of effort to patent one anyway, I can’t believe they wouldn’t then make some.
Myself, I would have thought it more effective to have troll food on the lure, rather than another troll, but maybe they are cannibalistic.
I was going say, 1997? All makes sense now.
Also these acre clearly troll patents and not patent trolls.
Patent troll got no pants.
Mail (will not be published) (required)