By Rob Beschizza at 5:20 am Mon, Jul 2, 2012
Hat tip to Rebecca Rosen.
As the legal copyright holder of the doll known as “Troll” I must insist…
Makes more sense in the context of the full patent.
It’s a lure. I wish there really were troll lures.
I like “FIG. 6″.
I think there are troll lures, someone has certainly gone to a lot of effort to patent one anyway, I can’t believe they wouldn’t then make some.
Myself, I would have thought it more effective to have troll food on the lure, rather than another troll, but maybe they are cannibalistic.
I was going say, 1997? All makes sense now.
Also these acre clearly troll patents and not patent trolls.
Patent troll got no pants.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
image, patent troll, trolls
Submit a tip
The rules you agree to by using this website.
Who will be eaten first?
Jason Weisberger, Publisher
Ken Snider, Sysadmin