Patent troll

Discuss

5 Responses to “Patent troll”

  1. Over the River says:

    As the legal copyright holder of the doll known as “Troll” I must insist…

    Happy July!

  2. Ambiguity says:

    Makes more sense in the context of the full patent.

    It’s a lure. I wish there really were troll lures.

    • Max Allan says:

      I like “FIG. 6″.
      I think there are troll lures, someone has certainly gone to a lot of effort to patent one anyway, I can’t believe they wouldn’t then make some.
      Myself, I would have thought it more effective to have troll food on the lure, rather than another troll, but maybe they are cannibalistic.

    • RedShirt77 says:

       I was going say, 1997? All makes sense now.

      Also these acre clearly troll patents and not patent trolls.

  3. pjcamp says:

    Patent troll got no pants.

Leave a Reply