— FEATURED —
Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling
Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy
The Snowden Principle
Carl Hiaasen's Bad Monkey
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: Workin' in the Data Mine...
Brain Rot: Alien Abduction
Real Stuff: Memoirs of a Fightin' Missionary
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere—livestreamed event in D.C. today
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere event D.C. May 29 with scholars, survivors; Xeni moderating
Photos: Throughout Latin America, protests demand justice for Guatemala after genocide trial overturned
— RECENTLY —
Atoms for Peace play a surprise intimate show in Los Angeles
Blunders of Genius: interesting errors by Darwin, Pauling, and Einstein
"By His Things Will You Know Him," a short story
Topsy Turvy World: surreal kids' picture book, now out in the USA
Hubsan X4 quadcopters: tiny cheap, powerful copter
Monsters and Legends: kids' monster book now in the USA!
Akissi: kids' comic about a mischievous girl in Cote D'Ivoire [now in the USA!]
A User's Guide to Neglectful Parenting, by Guy Delisle
Walking Dead 18: a magnificent villain who makes Hannibal Lecter look like Mr Rogers
Picture Day: wry, superb coming-of-age movie
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Rob Beschizza at 7:13 am Mon, Jul 30, 2012
I thought this was going to be about Kudzu.
I was thinking Robert Plant…
Ah, must be some kind of communication breakdown.
It’s always the same.
Thought Venus fly traps had mutated and got cannibalistic
The article says “VIDEO PROOF”, but I think I’m missing a few steps in the proof: Reportedly violent person at protest expresses wildly inconsistent views and has numbers tattooed on her wrist. Therefore, person is a police officer? For that to be the most parsimonious explanation, it seems like you’d have to argue that agents provacateur are more common than slightly crazy people.
From the article – the number tattooed on her wrist was a badge number
They speculated that it seemed like a badge number. (Also, would a cop tattoo their own badge number on their wrist? Seems like a family member of a police officer would be more likely to do so.) It’s still unclear if she’s a police plant or just crazy - I’m leaning towards crazy.
Yeah, if you tattoo it on your wrist, then it’s just another thing you have to put tape over when you’re on duty…
If true, this wouldn’t be the first time police were caught as plants trying to incite a riot. In 2006, a Garden Grove police officer admitted under oath during a deposition to masquerading as a protestor during a protest of Minuteman Project founder Jim Gilchrist in Garden Grove.
So police don’t necessarily have any ethical issues with such tactics. But there’s no direct evidence that the police were actually involved in this.
I don’t think she was crazy either (there are people with actual diagnosable mental illnesses and it seems a little reductive and insulting to go around labeling every asshole as “crazy”), if the tattoo is a relative’s badge number then I expect she’s just very angry that anyone could ever be upset at the police or think that the police had done anything wrong. And I think she decided to make her point by trying to provoke a police riot. Class act all the way.
Interesting point about the word “crazy”; I hadn’t though about that. I’m more careful *not* to use the word “crazy” when talking about people with diagnosable mental illnesses. It seems like that would be more insulting to the mentally ill than the way I used the word. Still, perhaps you’re right, in which case the word “crazy” would have little polite use. In that case I suppose I should have said, “irrational, unstable, and/or troubled” instead of “crazy”. Not that this woman definitely is any of those things, just that it seems more plausible an explanation than the agent provacateur hypothesis. There are other possibilities too, of course: maybe she just had a legitimate change of opinion mid-day and the bottle-throwing story is false.
There are other possibilities too, of course: maybe she just had a legitimate change of opinion mid-day and the bottle-throwing story is false.
That would contradict almost everything I know about human nature, while freaking out because a bunch of strangers are indirectly criticizing a loved one is absolutely consistent with what I know about human behavior.
“Irrational human being” seems redundant to me. I agree that she’s probably not a police plant, I’m still guessing “vigilante agent provocateur”.
If she is a police plant, it would seem a poor tactic to obviously switch sides in the course of a single protest. It does sound as if she might just be having problems, but obviously I can’t know. It will be interesting to see what turns up.
A tattoo of a badge number is something spouses of police officers sometimes get. That seems likely here.
Sure looks like amateur hour to me. Maybe figuring if shit goes down hubby gets a little more overtime?
C’mon, what department would be dumb enough to give an undercover assignment to someone with a badge-number tattoo?
Such a shame—thousands of decent people turn out for change, but the stories are always about the kooks, not the issues.
The same ones that always have them wear their normal, regulation boots?
I was hoping for Triffids, myself.