Trying to understand the secretive son-of-ACTA EU/Canada trade agreement

Michael Geist sez,

Last week's revelations that the Canada – EU Trade Agreement's intellectual property chapter draws heavily from the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement sparked widespread media coverage across Europe. After initially refusing to comment, the European Commission, clearly sensing the growing public pressure, provided a response in which it claimed that the leaked February 2012 text was outdated and that the Internet provider provisions in CETA (which had mirrored ACTA) had been changed.

The European Commission statement not only confirms some changes in CETA, but suggests that the final version will look like the EU – South Korea Free Trade Agreement. This disclosure raises its own set of concerns for both Europeans and Canadians. This posts outlines six major areas of concern given the current uncertainty with CETA, its linkages to ACTA, and the influence of the EU – South Korea FTA.

1. Canada Is Reluctant to Agree to the EU – South Korea FTA Model
2. The EU – South Korea FTA Is More Problematic Than ACTA In Some Areas
3. The EU – South Korea FTA Internet Provider Provisions Are Problematic
4. The ACTA Internet Provider Provisions Are Only Part of the Internet Chapter Problem
5. The ACTA Internet Chapter Is Only Part of the ACTA Problem
6. ACTA, CETA and the EU – South Korea FTA All Share a Common Trait: Lack of Transparency

Why the European Commission's Assurances on ACTA & CETA Don't Add Up