Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Tibetan documentary filmmaker faces trial in eastern Tibet for "inciting separatism."

Xeni Jardin at 7:31 am Tue, Jul 28, 2009

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

Tibetan filmmaker Dhondup Wangchen, who directed and filmed the documentary "Leaving Fear Behind" (excerpt embedded above) has been charged with "inciting separatism" and is awaiting trial in Siling in eastern Tibet (Chinese: Xining, Qinghai Province). The Chinese government will not allow his lawyers to represent him, so there is not much hope for a fair trial.

Supporters are urging people to take action, by sending a letter to Wu Aiying, China's Minister of Justice and Zhang Yesui, China's Ambassador to the United Nations, demanding Dhondup Wangchen's immediate and unconditional release.

Dhondup Wangchen has been detained since March 2008 and has suffered torture and ill-treatement at the hands of the Chinese authorities. He is being targeted for simply exercising his right to freedom of expression, and the charges against him are part of the Chinese government's widespread campaign to punish and silence Tibetan voices of dissent.
(via Students for a Free Tibet)

Previously:
  • Tibet: "Beijing 10" return to USA; new Tibet docu "Leaving Fear ...

Boing Boing editor/partner and tech culture journalist Xeni Jardin hosts and produces Boing Boing's in-flight TV channel on Virgin America airlines (#10 on the dial), and writes about living with breast cancer. Diagnosed in 2011. @xeni on Twitter. email: xeni@boingboing.net.

MORE:  censorship • Civlib • International • Maverick Spirit • movies

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Takuan

    boo!
    http://www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx?id=25237&article=UN+rights+chief%27s+%27refusal%27+to+meet+Dalai+Lama+disappoints+rights+group

  • Anonymous

    Maybe not a positive response but i don’t think theres anything that WE here can do. They execute people over there for similar charges. The mans innocent but their government wants slaves not freemen walking their country. He will be made an example for all others who wish to think outside of government mandated thinking points. His internment wont change anyones minds really but they’ll be afraid to speak up which for the Chinese government always will be good enough, since its the best response they can hope for.

    Good luck telling the Chinese their wrong to jail him and get back to me when they’ve unconditionally released him. I don’t think I’ll hold my breath for this one.

  • Anonymous

    And yet we drift on buying Chinese borrowing Chinese becoming Chinese.

    Peace

    Free Tibet

  • wylkyn

    “He is being targeted for simply exercising his right to freedom of expression”

    Does he have a right to freedom of expression under the Chinese government? I’m honestly asking this, since I am not familiar with their laws.

  • Anonymous

    Actually, yes, under China’s constitution he has the right to freedom of expression and under the Criminal Procedure Law of 1997 he also has the right to representation at trial (Art. IV). The limitation on these rights, as with *every* right supposedly enshrined in the Chinese constitution, is that the government can do literally anything it wants in the name of preserving the integrity and security of the country. In practice, this makes any rights Chinese people supposedly have meaningless, illusory. Not that the concept of “law” really means very much – trials almost have whatever outcome they’re supposed to have based on political expectations. They’re not proper trials at all, because their purpose is not to determine guilt or innocence – that’s preordained.

    Also unfortunate is that the constitution of the PRC builds Han supremacy, the nearly incoherent “one China” policy, and absolute national unity of the invented 56 ethnicities right in. It’s a fat load of nonsense, really.

  • Takuan

    the letter to Wu Aiying is good, but don’t forget to write your own government too.

  • Takuan

    http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/2009/07/30/D99OP7L00_as_china_lawyer/index.html

  • Takuan

    China never hesitates to play power politics
    http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSTRE56R1LR20090728

  • highlyverbal

    “Dhondup Wangchen has been detained since March 2008 and has suffered torture and ill-treatement at the hands of the Chinese authorities.”

    Are you seriously suggesting that we write to China and say they can’t incarcerate/torture people? Don’t we first have to … um … stop torturing people ourselves?

    Moral authority of Americans on torture = zero.

    • Antinous / Moderator

      Moral authority of Americans on torture = zero.

      Astroturfy use of Nirvana Fallacy = 100%.

  • Takuan

    in America, objecting to use of torture by republicans results in being ignored while they are in power. In China, objecting to torture results in being tortured.