NSA's CryptoKids and /b/'s PedoFriends: Separated at Birth?


36 Responses to “NSA's CryptoKids and /b/'s PedoFriends: Separated at Birth?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    “CryptoKids have been around for a few years at least. The FBI and CIA also have some similar kids’ pages. I’m really not sure what they’re trying to accomplish?”

    simple, waste tax payer money on shitty propaganda so as to relive the mistrust that children may develop for those money holes you call “agencies”

  2. Brainspore says:

    Yeah, Gargoyles was actually pretty OK. I was thinking of the Saturday morning cartoons of my youth in the early ’80s, which were of decidedly lower quality.

  3. Anonymous says:

    What the hell does Wired have against Assange?

  4. millrick says:

    i wanna be ‘obedience opossum’ when i grow up

  5. TooGoodToCheck says:

    I don’t even know what 4 of the pedo-friends’ names refer to. . . but I think I am old and wise enough not to look it up.

    • Donald Petersen says:

      I got that beat. Fully half of the PedoFriends are outside my realm of familiarity.

      And I feel perfectly happy in my ignorance of all things FutaShotaYuriGuroYaoiVore.

      One does wonder, however, what Warrantless Wombat keeps in his satchel, if not a sheaf of presigned-but-otherwise-blank warrants…

    • Nelson.C says:

      I can see five with names derived from Japanese words that might give someone trouble. I’m now wondering which of those is the one you’re familiar with.

  6. Anonymous says:

    They did actually have names. There was a website with character details for each of them, and back stories, all sorts of crazy stuff.

    I forget their names but as I recall the two in the middle are navajo code-talkers.

  7. grimc says:

    You had me at ‘Chickenhawk’.

  8. Rob Beschizza says:

    The intro sequences were good; the episodes, not so much.

  9. Anonymous says:

    I’d like to point out that the characters are originally from 2chan, where they aren’t associated with pornography at all.

    pedobear, for example, stands for bravery and manliness in japan.

  10. Robert says:

    Rob wins +1 Internets for the Assange joke!

  11. Gregory Goldmacher says:

    Political “art” is ridiculous.

    And cartoons are silly, but we don’t know any better when we’re kids.

  12. Nadreck says:

    Yes, all of the intelligence agencies and other US “Alphabet Agencies” have darling Kid’s Websites. The CIA’s is particularly nifty.

  13. nataliefrey says:

    what a rip
    i am a turtle

  14. retchdog says:

    Holy hell, that labeled version of the CryptoKids (at least it wasn’t “KryptoKids”) was hilarious. Thanks boingboing!

  15. Anonymous says:

    Scat = crap, Futa = shemale (futanari), shota = young boy, yuri = lesbian, guro = grotesque (organs removed, that kinda stuff), vore = eat or being eaten, S&M = sado masochism, furry = bestiality or similar, pedo = obvious, yaoi = gay (male), hetero = also obvious, watersports = peeing

    Don’t ask how I know these things.

    • Anonymous says:

      #13, the same basic rules apply to who gets to use the word s—— as to who gets to use n—–. A lot of the people consider s—— a slur.

    • Anonymous says:

      Futanari, if I remember correctly, translates as roughly “two forms”. So by the literal translation it could mean any person bearing sexual characteristics from both genders, but I’ve been given to understand that in the Japanese ero market, it typically refers specifically to women with at least aspects of both types of genitalia.
      Newhalf is used to refer to people with bodies of one sex (eg, the secondary sexual characteristics) but the genitalia of the other.

      Guro can mean both gore and grotesque; gore referring to sexualized depictions of murder and mutilation; grotesque referring to sexualized depictions of, ah, “rarities”, eg, conjoined people, people with extraordinary numbers of piercings, people with multiples of limbs but who not otherwise fantastic, etc.

    • Anonymous says:

      #13: Oh no you don’t, You ain’t getting away from that one.
      The rest are correct, but I’d like to note that Furry != Bestiality. http://www.wikifur.com.

      No flames, just a correction.

  16. andyhavens says:

    I let my kid watch “Dora the Informer,” until he called me in for what I still contend is fair-use of copyrighted materials in a research project. Kid just kept chanting, “Zero tolerance!” and squeaking a plastic judge’s hammer.

  17. The Hamster King says:

    I never realized Pedobear was part of the Chinese zodiac. That’s something they don’t tell you on your chopstick sleeve!

    When is the next Year of the Pedobear?

  18. ClintonD says:

    I loled hard at “Julian Assange”

  19. Stefan Jones says:

    That’s not an oppossum. It’s clearly a fox. FISAless Fox, maybe?

  20. penguinchris says:

    OK, ignoring the fake names and the PedoFriends for a moment, is anyone else curious whether or not kids actually respond to these kinds of things?

    It seems like the only way anyone knows how to get kids interested in things like this is to make cartoon characters. But they look like they were drawn by Pam in marketing, not a professional artist, and that they were designed by a committee. In other words, they look *really lame* and not something kids would actually be interested in.

    Or… maybe that’s their filter. If the kid does actually like this, then that means they’ll fit in to the government agency culture (not to say anything bad about the NSA – I have applied to work there).

    • TooGoodToCheck says:

      I dunno man, my kids seem to have just an unspeakable tolerance for shitty cartoons. hulu started running the old Super Mario show, and my kids loved it; I found it to be completely horrible and cheesy.

      I. . . I honestly have never seen them encounter art, voice acting, or a plot so bad that they wouldn’t spend some time watching. Kids TV is 85% a wasteland of complete drek, with a few unexpected gems.

      so, in my opinion, it’s totally reasonable to think that kids between 4 & 8 would be content to spend some time on the CryptoKids thing. Not sure how much they’d actually be influenced by it, but I do think that slick presentation and interesting character design are not prerequisites for getting some attention.

      • Ted8305 says:

        Try watching an old episode of Thundercats or Transformers or (insert favorite nostalgic cartoon here). Dude, they’re not as good as we remembered. The magic of childhood, I guess.

      • Brainspore says:

        I dunno man, my kids seem to have just an unspeakable tolerance for shitty cartoons.

        What Ted8305 and Donald Petersen said- if you’re still remembering ’80s cartoons as non-shitty works of art then you probably haven’t watched any of them lately. Leaving aside the fact that most of them were 20-minute toy commercials (periodically punctuated by 30-second toy commercials) the writing and production values sucked. About 40% of each episode of Voltron was recycled footage and the last time I saw an excerpt of “The Smurfs” I realized that the characters’ high-pitched voices hit my adult ears like nails on a chalkboard.

        Compared to what we were watching at that age Spongebob Squarepants is Citizen freakin’ Kane.

        • Promethean Sky says:

          I was a young’un in the late 80s and early 90′s. Ninja Turtles were the shizz. And I challenge anyone to claim that the first two seasons of Gargoyles didn’t rock. (let’s pretend there was no third season)

  21. Beelzebuddy says:

    In my (limited) experience, children come equipped with fairly sophisticated bullshit detectors. They know that the creepy bear with the van [i]probably[/i] shouldn’t be trusted. They know that after-school specials (do they still have those?) and school PSA posters are manipulative in a cheesily unsubtle way, though they might not express it in those words. Kids’ priorities tend towards the immediate and their entertainment expectations are [i]really[/i] low, but they’re pretty damn savvy regardless.

    So long as the government makes propaganda with characters like Snitcheroo the Kangaroo, I have hope for society.

  22. Anonymous says:

    Well yes, if you want to get down to semantics everything can be boiled down to more pinpoint descriptions, but keep in mind the list is more watered down for people that aren’t really in to these kinda things. As for the furry thing, in ways it can be considered bestiality, but note the “or similar” part, referring to sexy fur and humanoid animals. I stated it in a sexual manner since, well, it’s a list from the chans that is sexual in nature, but I digress.

  23. Beelzebuddy says:

    Huh. I knew those [] tags looked out of context somehow.

Leave a Reply