Scorching legal response from Dajaz1.com to the unsealed US gov't docs on the illegal, sleazy seizure of its domain name

Mel from Dajaz1.com -- the hiphop blog that was seized for a year by the US government on the basis of a false and unsubstantiated copyright claim from the RIAA -- has posted the site's lawyer's memo, officially calling out the US government for its illegal participation in the RIAA's sloppy shakedown. Fenwick and West's Andrew P Bridges doesn't mince words, either:

The owner of Dajaz1.com appreciates the fact that the United States Government, on studying the matter further with all the information the RIAA could furnish, determined that there was in fact no probable cause to seek a forfeiture of the domain it had seized and held for a year.

That exoneration, however, did not remedy the harms caused by a full year of censorship and secret proceedings — a form of “digital Guantanamo” — that knocked out an important and popular blog devoted to hip hop music and has nearly killed it.

The original seizure was unjustified. The delay was unjustified. The secrecy in extensions of the forfeiture deadlines was unjustified.

Five details are notable here.

First, the seizure occurred pursuant to language the PRO-IP Act authorizing seizures of property used in connection with the making of, or trafficking in, “articles” in violation of copyright law. In that context, “articles” are physical items. The law does not authorize seizure of domains that link to other sites. So from the beginning this seizure was entirely legally unjustified, no matter what the allegations about infringement...

Second, seizing a blog for linking to four songs, even allegedly infringing ones, is equivalent to seizing the printing press of the New York Times because the newspaper, in its concert calendar, refers readers to four concerts where the promoters of those concerts have failed to pay ASCAP for the performance licenses.

Third, RIAA’s grand and sweeping attacks on dajaz1.com suggest that RIAA’s powers of demonization far exceed its ability to substantiate its malicious statements with specific and credible facts.

Fourth , when I explained that the blog publisher had received music from the industry itself, a government attorney replied that authorization was an “affirmative defense” that need not be taken into account by the government in carrying out the seizure. That was stunning.

Fifth, when discussing the secret extensions with the U.S. Attorney’s office in Los Angeles, I repeatedly asked the government attorney to inform the court that my client opposed any further extensions and asked for an opportunity to be heard. Not once did the government reveal those requests or positions to the court. The government should be embarrassed for keeping that information from the court.

This entire episode shows that neither the government nor the recording industry deserves any additional powers with new so-called “antipiracy” legislation, especially in the context where copyright law has been expanded and new anti-piracy remedies have been crafted ***16 times*** since 1982. This episode shows that the copyright establishment and the government are very much the “rogues” that deserve to be reined in.

Our Response To Unsealed Court Documents In Dajaz1 Domain Seizure

7

  1. “The government should be embarrassed for keeping that information from the court.”

    Scorching!  I bet the government is absolutely red-faced and contrite.

    [deep sigh]

  2. “….authorization was an “affirmative defense” that need not be taken into account by the government in carrying out the seizure.”

    Does this imply that Uncle feels he can seize your domain any time he wants, even if every link and file  is totally legit?

    Somebody remind me again what’s so great about this country.  I keep forgetting.

  3. This is a perfect example of what happens when lazy, stupid, cost-cutting bureaucrats decide to outsource their own agency’s  duties and obligations.

    And all, of course, in the name of “protecting the free market” – The same Free Market that colludes with and bullshits the gubmint into stifling the competition that is supposed to be the lifeblood that keeps the Free Market robust.

  4. This is a perfect example of what happens when lazy, stupid, cost-cutting bureaucrats decide to outsource their own agency’s  duties and obligations.

    And all, of course, in the name of “protecting the free market” – The same Free Market that colludes with and bullshits the gubmint into stifling the competition that is supposed to be the lifeblood that keeps the Free Market robust.

Comments are closed.