Patrick Farley reboots Cloverfield

Discuss

24 Responses to “Patrick Farley reboots Cloverfield”

  1. snagglepuss says:

    Mothra owns his pansy ass.

    The Golden Cake Monster’s, not Patrick Farley’s.

  2. malindrome says:

    Not enough shakey-cam.  I could actually see what was going on in that comic.  Also, the characters weren’t whiney enough, and I didn’t wish violent, monster-related death upon them.

  3. bcsizemo says:

    Given a choice, I think I’d pay to read that comic over sitting 2 hours to see the movie for free.

  4. Dan Hibiki says:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1nxaQhsaaw

  5. LintMan says:

    Anyone else here reminded of Towing Jehovah?

  6. groves says:

    Why does this make me sad?

  7. n0mad13 says:

    This, I imagine, is what you would see if you looked at a ginger root after consuming a good fist-full of psychedelics. 

  8. BDiamond says:

    So, basically, it’s a big Shmoo?

  9. hypnosifl says:

    I like it, but is it supposed to be satirical? I mean, it doesn’t seem to relate at all to Cloverfield, even in the look of the monster–is the “concept” here that it’s a joke about how reboots are often totally different in story and tone from the originals?

  10. Two Wolves says:

    Cloverfield groks.

  11. Stefan Jones says:

    Cory should have noted that the parent page is Farley’s new sketch blog. There’s some great stuff there already. I’m surprised that the Siri comic wasn’t plugged on Boing Boing. 

    • Halloween_Jack says:

      I think that this might be the best medium of publication for Farley, since, as Cory points out, he can be maddeningly erratic. (I’d get into something that he’d done in the past, only to wait for another installation… and wait, and wait… and then have him come out with something else that I’d be all what is this I don’t even.) 

Leave a Reply