The local government of the District of Columbia has been conducting a pilot project to test an internet-based voting system
that would give overseas and military voters a way to download and submit absentee ballots online. Here's a PDF of the system architecture
. Before using the system in a real voting process, the public was invited to evaluate its security and usability. That's where J. Alex Halderman
of Freedom to Tinker
This is exactly the kind of open, public testing that many of us in the e-voting security community -- including me -- have been encouraging vendors and municipalities to conduct. So I was glad to participate, even though the test was launched with only three days' notice. I assembled a team from the University of Michigan, including my students, Eric Wustrow and Scott Wolchok, and Dawn Isabel, a member of the University of Michigan technical staff.
Within 36 hours of the system going live, our team had found and exploited a vulnerability that gave us almost total control of the server software, including the ability to change votes and reveal voters' secret ballots. In this post, I'll describe what we did, how we did it, and what it means for Internet voting.
An awful lot of meaty details follow, but here's the punchline:
Based on this experience and other results from the public tests, the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics has announced that they will not proceed with a live deployment of electronic ballot return at this time, though they plan to continue to develop the system. Voters will still be able to download and print ballots to return by mail, which seems a lot less risky.
Oh, diva snap
Hacking the D.C. Internet Voting Pilot (Freedom to Tinker, thanks Jake)
It’s been just over a year since Jeremy Corbyn won the UK Labour Party leadership race with the biggest margin in history — an avowed socialist who would reverse the party’s years of special gifts to the UK’s legendarily corrupt finance sector, fight mass surveillance, pull out of secretive trade deals — a frugal man […]
This wonderful little video by Randy Olson lays out one argument for why as a public political speaker, Donald Trump is perceived to be such a crowd-pleaser, and Hillary Clinton gets weaker scores. It’s all about narrative design.
Part of an ongoing series by weird chart-maker Scott Bateman; link to today’s edition.
If you own a dog, you’ve most likely heard of BarkBox – the monthly subscription box for dogs. What started as a simple idea to try out the subscription model on pet owners has since developed a cult following of dog lovers. If you haven’t given it a try yet, this one month free deal is the […]
With the iPhone headphone jack having gone by the wayside, we’re excited about the addition of the FRANKLIN Bluetooth Headphones in our store. These headphones are foldable so they’re easy to carry around, but most importantly, they pack impressive sound. Our biggest struggle with Bluetooth headphones is the worry of them dying at the worst moment. This pair lasts an impressive 8-10 […]
Evan Kimbrell, founder of the digital agency Sprintkick, recently released a series of online courses that feature some of the best advice we’ve come across. These courses are well worth your time, and will save you from making many typical mistakes down the line if you ever want to start your own business.With this Business […]