Tim Chartier, an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Davidson College, has a series of ingenious and delicious methods for illustrating fundamental concepts from calculus using chocolates. I had a brilliant calculus teacher, Alvin Anson, but I think a little chocolate would have improved even his techniques:

Where’s the chocolate? Rather than shading a square, we will place a milk chocolate chip on a square we would have colored red and a white chocolate chip on a region that would have been white. To begin, the six by six grid on the left becomes the chocolate chip mosaic we see on the right, which uses 14 white chocolate of the total 36 chips. So, our estimate of π is 2.4444. We are off by about 0.697.
Next, we move to an 11 by 11 grid of chocolate chips. If you count carefully, we use 83 milk chocolate chips of the 121 total. This gives us an estimate of 2.7438 for π, which correlates to an error of about 0.378.

Finally, with the help of public school teachers in my seminar Math through Popular Culture for the Charlotte Teachers Institute, we placed chocolate chips on a 54 by 54 grid. In the end, we used 2232 milk chocolate chips giving an estimate of 3.0617 having an error of 0.0799.

(*via Neatorama*)

Larkin Jones is a hardcore Pokemon fan who loses money every year on his annual Pokemon PAX party; he makes up the shortfall from his wages managing a cafe. This year, Pokémon Company International sued him and told him that even though he’d cancelled this year’s party, they’d take everything he had unless he paid […]

When your scorn cannot be contained in the anatomy of a bilaterally symmetrical life-form. Baffle your enemies! Win the admiration of your friends! Improve your manual dexterity! (via Super Punch)

Gus writes, “When we created The Media Show (previously) decided the best way to teach about digital and media literacy was to answer the questions people were already asking Google, we didn’t anticipate how bizarre some of the questions would be.”

Skip the technical jargon and get right to taking amazing, professional-quality photos with this complete training. The Hollywood Art Institute Photography Course includes 22 modules filled with tutorials on how to profit off of your photography, or simply capture your memories in the manner they deserve.Accredited by the Photography Education Accreditation CouncilDive into this 22 […]

Power up your gadgets in the most unexpected places with the extremely compact SolarJuice battery pack. SolarJuice charges up at home like your average battery pack, but also lets you add extra juice on-the-go using its built-in solar panel—so you’ll never be left unplugged from the digital world.4.5 Stars on Amazon!Simultaneously charges 2 devices at […]

Hold your camera to higher standards with the brand-new iBlazr 2, the most advanced LED flash to date. Simply attach to your smartphone, tablet, or DSLR camera. Conveniently sized and wireless, this premium flash will let you easily take amazing photos in low light situations. It’s a literal snap to use: simply attach to your […]

Seems more like an example of the monte carlo method to me…

it’s not monte carlo since it’s not random. the phrase you’re looking for is “discrete approximation”.

as a surly academic, i want to hate this, but i really can’t. it’s a decent demonstration of taking limits and it would probably get some attention which otherwise would have been dissipated. if you had a lot of time and chocolates of various sizes, you could even hint at fractal dimension.

Personally, I don’t like the definition that a square with ANY part of the curve is given to white chocolate. I feel that the dark chocolate should have those. Yes, I am in favor of Manifest Destiny, but ONLY for dark chocolate.

Your next assignment is to use thousands of little tablets to find the value of

e.Oh no, that chocolate would never remain on the board unmolested long enough to work out any calculus problems. ‘Where’s the chocolate?’ Indeed.

what a delicious way to teach.

Ah, the days when we used to learn the chain rule with peanut M&Ms.

Wow…

Connect Four looks much more complicated here than how I remember it as a kid.

It is cute, but it isn’t calculus. I can’t think of a good use of chocolate for teaching calculus, except as an incentive. However, this chocolate idea is great for teaching both geometry and algebra. You can derive formulas for the areas of various geometric shapes such as squares, rectangles, rhombi, trapezoids, and triangles using chocolate chips. If you are brave you could derive formulas for some 3D shapes such as pyramids. You can also derive algebraic formulas such as the sum of the first k integers equals k(k+1)/2 and x^2-1=(x+1)(x-1) by rearranging chocolate chips. There is a wonderful book called “Proofs Without Words” available from the American Math Association. Many of its proofs could be done with chocolate.

–CAT

man this trumps domino computing

I tried this method out, but I seem to encounter an error whereby my

calculations are increasingly off by about 1 every 30 seconds.

*munch*munch*

Wonder why that is?

*munch*munch*

When you think of the other definition of calculus, this is pretty damned funny.

The approximation would be much more accurate if we counted the tiles that have an apparent majority of their area inside the curve.