BoingBoing
SEARCH STORE
  • SEARCH
  • STORE
  • Blog : The posts
  • Forums : Read the rules
  • Store : Wonderful Products (Contact Support)
  • About Us : Writers and staff
  • Contact Us : Get satisfaction
  • Advertise : Thank you for reading
  • Privacy Policy : The data you generate
  • TOS : What you agree to
  • scientific method Why bad science is sometimes "more appealing" than good science, even for other scientists David Pescovitz
  • droplets The true history of a small mistake that made scientists screw up COVID aerosols Thom Dunn
  • scientific method Adam Savage responds to the concept of "No basis in science" Gareth Branwyn
  • survivor bias Explainer: how anecdotal evidence about alternative medicine can lead you astray Cory Doctorow
  • alltrials When scientists hoard data, no one can tell what works Cory Doctorow
  • scientific method Young fellow makes, tests and celebrates outstanding Rube Goldberg machine Cory Doctorow
Next

Read the rules you agree to by using this website in our Terms of Service.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Boing Boing uses cookies and analytics trackers, and is supported by advertising, merchandise sales and affiliate links. Read about what we do with the data we gather in our Privacy Policy.

Who will be eaten first? Our forum rules are detailed in the Community Guidelines.

Boing Boing is published under a Creative Commons license except where otherwise noted.

    • Mark Frauenfelder
    • David Pescovitz
    • Rob Beschizza
    • Carla Sinclair
    Editors
    • Jason Weisberger
    Publisher
    • Ken Snider
    Sysadmin
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Forums
    • Shop
    • Report a Bad Ad
    • Shop Support